Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911150›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2016

Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.

Dori L Klemanski, Kristine K Browning, Jennifer Kue

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Primary care providers and their needs caring for cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health Care Transitions Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Thai oncology nurses' perspectives toward survivorship care plan components and implementation for colorectal cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dori L KlemanskiThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, 460 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Dori.Klemanski@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-8269
Kristine K BrowningThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, 460 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Jennifer KueThe Ohio State University College of Nursing, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this systematic review was to describe and examine the current use of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans (TSs/SCPs) for cancer survivors, as well as to summarize and critically assess relevant literature regarding their preferences and usefulness. There is a knowledge gap regarding the preferences of stakeholders as to what is useful on a treatment summary or survivorship care plan.

methodsA systematic review of eligible manuscripts was conducted using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies were identified via PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 through 2013. Eligible studies were critically appraised with qualitative and quantitative appraisal tools.

resultsThere were 29 studies included in this review; 19 were quantitative. Survivors and primary care physicians preferred a printable format delivered 0 to 6 months posttreatment and highlighting signs and symptoms of recurrence, late, and long-term effects, and recommendations for healthy living. Oncology providers supported the concept of treatment summary and survivorship care plan but reported significant barriers to their provision. No studies incorporated caregiver perspectives of treatment summary and survivorship care plan.

conclusionThis systematic review did not reveal conclusive evidence regarding the needs of survivors or providers regarding treatment summaries and survivorship care plans. A lack of rigorous studies contributed to this. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Treatment summaries and survivorship care plans are useful for cancer survivors; however, future rigorous studies should be conducted to identify and prioritize the preferences of survivors regarding these.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelConsumer BehaviorEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansNeoplasmsPatient Care PlanningPatient PreferencePhysicians, Primary CareQuality of Health CareSurvivorsCancer survivorsJBI-QARIQAQTSSurvivorship care plansSystematic reviewTreatment summaries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.