Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25911061›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology2015

A Literature Review of Renal Surgical Anatomy and Surgical Strategies for Partial Nephrectomy.

Tobias Klatte, Vincenzo Ficarra, Christian Gratzke, Jihad Kaouk, Alexander Kutikov, Veronica Macchi, Alexandre Mottrie, Francesco Porpiglia, James Porter, Craig G Rogers and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Comparison of SuturelessFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Sarcopenia predicts prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Doppler ultrasound for the evaluation of chronic renal allograft dysfunction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.

Tobias KlatteDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: tobias.klatte@gmx.de.
Vincenzo FicarraDepartment of Urology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Christian GratzkeDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jihad KaoukCenter for Advanced Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Alexander KutikovDepartment of Urological Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Veronica MacchiCentre for Mechanics of Biological Materials, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Alexandre MottrieOLV Robotic Surgery Institute, Aalst, Belgium.
Francesco PorpigliaDepartment of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital-Orbassano, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
James PorterSwedish Urology Group, Seattle, WA, USA.
Craig G RogersVattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Paul RussoUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
R Houston ThompsonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert G UzzoDepartment of Urological Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher G WoodDepartment of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Inderbir S GillUniversity of Southern California Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USHenry Ford Hospital · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMayo Clinic · USMedical University of Vienna · ATMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BEOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITSwedish Medical Center · USTemple University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextA detailed understanding of renal surgical anatomy is necessary to optimize preoperative planning and operative technique and provide a basis for improved outcomes.

objectiveTo evaluate the literature regarding pertinent surgical anatomy of the kidney and related structures, nephrometry scoring systems, and current surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy (PN). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature review was conducted. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Surgical renal anatomy fundamentally impacts PN surgery. The renal artery divides into anterior and posterior divisions, from which approximately five segmental terminal arteries originate. The renal veins are not terminal. Variations in the vascular and lymphatic channels are common; thus, concurrent lymphadenectomy is not routinely indicated during PN for cT1 renal masses in the setting of clinically negative lymph nodes. Renal-protocol contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is used for standard imaging. Anatomy-based nephrometry scoring systems allow standardized academic reporting of tumor characteristics and predict PN outcomes (complications, remnant function, possibly histology). Anatomy-based novel surgical approaches may reduce ischemic time during PN; these include early unclamping, segmental clamping, tumor-specific clamping (zero ischemia), and unclamped PN. Cancer cure after PN relies on complete resection, which can be achieved by thin margins. Post-PN renal function is impacted by kidney quality, remnant quantity, and ischemia type and duration.

conclusionsSurgical renal anatomy underpins imaging, nephrometry scoring systems, and vascular control techniques that reduce global renal ischemia and may impact post-PN function. A contemporary ideal PN excises the tumor with a thin negative margin, delicately secures the tumor bed to maximize vascularized remnant parenchyma, and minimizes global ischemia to the renal remnant with minimal complications. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we review renal surgical anatomy. Renal mass imaging allows detailed delineation of the anatomy and vasculature and permits nephrometry scoring, and thus precise, patient-specific surgical planning. Novel off-clamp techniques have been developed that may lead to improved outcomes.

Indexed as

HumansKidneyNephrectomyAnatomyArteryComplicationsImagingIschemiaNephrometryPartial nephrectomyRenal functionVein

Identifiers

PMID25911061
PMCPMC4994971
OpenAlexW2004650249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.