Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25910542›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2015

The Effect of a Global, Subject, and Device-Specific Model on a Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring Multisensor System.

Andreas Caduff, Mattia Zanon, Martin Mueller, Pavel Zakharov, Yuri Feldman, Oscar De Feo, Marc Donath, Werner A Stahel, Mark S Talary

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreas CaduffBiovotion AG, Zurich, Switzerland andreas.caduff@biovotion.com.
Mattia ZanonBiovotion AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin MuellerBiovotion AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pavel ZakharovBiovotion AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yuri FeldmanDepartment of Applied Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Oscar De FeoBiovotion AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marc DonathClinic for Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Werner A StahelSeminar for Statistics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mark S TalaryBiovotion AG, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe study here the influence of different patients and the influence of different devices with the same patients on the signals and modeling of data from measurements from a noninvasive Multisensor glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 diabetes. The Multisensor includes several sensors for biophysical monitoring of skin and underlying tissue integrated on a single substrate.

methodTwo Multisensors were worn simultaneously, 1 on the upper left and 1 on the upper right arm by 4 patients during 16 study visits. Glucose was administered orally to induce 2 consecutive hyperglycemic excursions. For the analysis, global (valid for a population of patients), personal (tailored to a specific patient), and device-specific multiple linear regression models were derived.

resultsWe find that adjustments of the model to the patients improves the performance of the glucose estimation with an MARD of 17.8% for personalized model versus a MARD of 21.1% for the global model. At the same time the effect of the measurement side is negligible. The device can equally well measure on the left or right arm. We also see that devices are equal in the linear modeling. Thus hardware calibration of the sensors is seen to be sufficient to eliminate interdevice differences in the measured signals.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that the hardware of the 2 devices worn on the left and right arms are consistent yielding similar measured signals and thus glucose estimation results with a global model. The 2 devices also return similar values of glucose errors. These errors are mainly due to nonstationarities in the measured signals that are not solved by the linear model, thus suggesting for more sophisticated modeling approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsArmBiophysicsBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringBody Mass IndexCalibrationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Equipment DesignHumansLinear ModelsMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryReproducibility of ResultsSkinBlood Glucosealgorithmdiabeteselectromagneticopticalperturbationswearable device

Identifiers

PMID25910542
PMCPMC4525657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.