Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25910490›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

A pooling-based approach to mapping genetic variants associated with DNA methylation.

Irene M Kaplow, Julia L MacIsaac, Sarah M Mah, Lisa M McEwen, Michael S Kobor, Hunter B Fraser

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fine-mappingeLife · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Post-GWAS Era: From Association to Function.American journal of human genetics · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fishing for Function in the Human Gene Pool.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene M KaplowDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
Julia L MacIsaacCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada;
Sarah M MahCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada;
Lisa M McEwenCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Michael S KoborCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Hunter B FraserDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA;
University of British Columbia · CAStanford University · US

Funding

Genome-wide discovery of allele-specific gene expression and chromatin statesR21HG005240 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, HUNTER B · 2010 to 2011
$435k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R21HG005240-01A1NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG005240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that plays a key role in gene regulation. Previous studies have investigated its genetic basis by mapping genetic variants that are associated with DNA methylation at specific sites, but these have been limited to microarrays that cover <2% of the genome and cannot account for allele-specific methylation (ASM). Other studies have performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing on a few individuals, but these lack statistical power to identify variants associated with DNA methylation. We present a novel approach in which bisulfite-treated DNA from many individuals is sequenced together in a single pool, resulting in a truly genome-wide map of DNA methylation. Compared to methods that do not account for ASM, our approach increases statistical power to detect associations while sharply reducing cost, effort, and experimental variability. As a proof of concept, we generated deep sequencing data from a pool of 60 human cell lines; we evaluated almost twice as many CpGs as the largest microarray studies and identified more than 2000 genetic variants associated with DNA methylation. We found that these variants are highly enriched for associations with chromatin accessibility and CTCF binding but are less likely to be associated with traits indirectly linked to DNA, such as gene expression and disease phenotypes. In summary, our approach allows genome-wide mapping of genetic variants associated with DNA methylation in any tissue of any species, without the need for individual-level genotype or methylation data.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingDNA MethylationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesCell LineComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGene LibraryGenetic Association StudiesGenome, HumanGenotypeHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID25910490
PMCPMC4448686
OpenAlexW2144095675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.