Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25910390›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2015

Loneliness across phylogeny and a call for comparative studies and animal models.

John T Cacioppo, Stephanie Cacioppo, Steven W Cole, John P Capitanio, Luc Goossens, Dorret I Boomsma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Stability and Change of Loneliness Across the Life Span: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Loneliness: An Existential and Public Health Issue.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John T CacioppoCenter for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago Cacioppo@uchicago.edu.
Stephanie CacioppoCenter for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine.
Steven W ColeDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
John P CapitanioDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis.
Luc GoossensSchool Psychology and Child and Adolescent Development, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Dorret I BoomsmaBiological Psychology Department, VU University Amsterdam.

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
Social Regulation of Gene Expression, SupplementR37AG033590 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CACIOPPO, JOHN T. · 2010 to 2017
$3.5M
NIA NIH HHS R37 AG033590NIA NIH HHS R37AG033590NIH HHS P51 OD011107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness typically refers to the feelings of distress and dysphoria resulting from a discrepancy between a person's desired and achieved levels of social relations, and there is now considerable evidence that loneliness is a risk factor for poor psychological and physical health. Loneliness has traditionally been conceptualized as a uniquely human phenomenon. However, over millions of years of evolution, efficient and manifold neural, hormonal, and molecular mechanisms have evolved for promoting companionship and mutual protection/assistance and for organizing adaptive responses when there is a significant discrepancy between the preferred and realized levels of social connection. We review evidence suggesting that loneliness is not a uniquely human phenomenon, but, instead, as a scientific construct, it represents a generally adaptive predisposition that can be found across phylogeny. Central to this argument is the premise that the brain is the key organ of social connections and processes. Comparative studies and animal models, particularly when integrated with human studies, have much to contribute to the understanding of loneliness and its underlying principles, mechanisms, consequences, and potential treatments.

Indexed as

LonelinessAnimalsHumansanimal modelslonelinessmechanismsphylogenysocial neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID25910390
PMCPMC5090712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.