ArticlePloS one2015
Identifying stride-to-stride control strategies in human treadmill walking.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-objective control in human walking: insight gained through simultaneous degradation of energetic and motor regulation systems.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Trial
- Effects of one night of sleep deprivation on single- and dual-task gait.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- How visual context influences lateral stepping regulation while walking on winding paths.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Adapting lateral stepping control to walk on winding paths.Journal of biomechanics · 2025Article
- A model of task-level human stepping regulation yields semistable walking.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- A model of task-level human stepping regulation yields semistable walking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Quantifying changes in individual-specific template-based representations of center-of-mass dynamics during walking with ankle exoskeletons using Hybrid-SINDy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Can minimum toe clearance predict community-based trips by older adults?Gait & posture · 2024Article
- How older adults regulate lateral stepping on narrowing walking paths.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Article
- Article
- Speed-dependent modulations of asymmetric center of body mass trajectory in the gait of above-knee amputee subjects.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Article
- Adaptive multi-objective control explains how humans make lateral maneuvers while walking.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Insight into the hierarchical control governing leg stiffness during the stance phase of running.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Viability, task switching, and fall avoidance of the simplest dynamic walker.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Validity and Sensitivity of an Inertial Measurement Unit-Driven Biomechanical Model of Motor Variability for Gait.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effects of gait rehabilitation on motor coordination in stroke survivors: an UCM-based approach.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Perceptual-motor styles.Experimental brain research · 2021Review
- Walking humans trade off different task goals to regulate lateral stepping.Journal of biomechanics · 2021Article
- Novel velocity estimation for symmetric and asymmetric self-paced treadmill training.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variability is ubiquitous in human movement, arising from internal and external noise, inherent biological redundancy, and from the neurophysiological control actions that help regulate movement fluctuations. Increased walking variability can lead to increased energetic cost and/or increased fall risk. Conversely, biological noise may be beneficial, even necessary, to enhance motor performance. Indeed, encouraging more variability actually facilitates greater improvements in some forms of locomotor rehabilitation. Thus, it is critical to identify the fundamental principles humans use to regulate stride-to-stride fluctuations in walking. This study sought to determine how humans regulate stride-to-stride fluctuations in stepping movements during treadmill walking. We developed computational models based on pre-defined goal functions to compare if subjects, from each stride to the next, tried to maintain the same speed as the treadmill, or instead stay in the same position on the treadmill. Both strategies predicted average behaviors empirically indistinguishable from each other and from that of humans. These strategies, however, predicted very different stride-to-stride fluctuation dynamics. Comparisons to experimental data showed that human stepping movements were generally well-predicted by the speed-control model, but not by the position-control model. Human subjects also exhibited no indications they corrected deviations in absolute position only intermittently: i.e., closer to the boundaries of the treadmill. Thus, humans clearly do not adopt a control strategy whose primary goal is to maintain some constant absolute position on the treadmill. Instead, humans appear to regulate their stepping movements in a way most consistent with a strategy whose primary goal is to try to maintain the same speed as the treadmill at each consecutive stride. These findings have important implications both for understanding how biological systems regulate walking in general and for being able to harness these mechanisms to develop more effective rehabilitation interventions to improve locomotor performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.