Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25909595›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Patients' knowledge, attitudes, behaviour and health care experiences on the prevention, detection, management and control of hypertension in Colombia: a qualitative study.

Helena Legido-Quigley, Paul Anthony Camacho Lopez, Dina Balabanova, Pablo Perel, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Robby Nieuwlaat, J-D Schwalm, Tara McCready, Salim Yusuf, Martin McKee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Helena Legido-QuigleyDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Paul Anthony Camacho LopezFundación Oftalmológica de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Dina BalabanovaDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Pablo PerelDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Patricio Lopez-JaramilloFundación Oftalmológica de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia; Instituto Masira, Medical School, Universidad de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Robby NieuwlaatPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J-D SchwalmPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tara McCreadyPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Salim YusufPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Martin McKeeDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is a leading cause of premature death worldwide and the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Effective screening programs, communication with patients, regular monitoring, and adherence to treatment are essential to successful management but may be challenging in health systems facing resource constraints. This qualitative study explored patients' knowledge, attitudes, behaviour and health care seeking experiences in relation to detection, treatment and control of hypertension in Colombia. We conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 26 individuals with hypertension and 4 family members in two regions. Few participants were aware of ways to prevent high blood pressure. Once diagnosed, most reported taking medication but had little information about their condition and had a poor understanding of their treatment regime. The desire for good communication and a trusting relationship with the doctor emerged as key themes in promoting adherence to medication and regular attendance at medical appointments. Barriers to accessing treatment included co-payments for medication; costs of transport to health care facilities; unavailability of drugs; and poor access to specialist care. Some patients overcame these barriers with support from social networks, family members and neighbours. However, those who lacked such support, experienced loneliness and struggled to access health care services. The health insurance scheme was frequently described as administratively confusing and those accessing the state subsidized system believed that the treatment was inferior to that provided under the compulsory contributory system. Measures that should be addressed to improve hypertension management in Colombia include better communication between health care professionals and patients, measures to improve understanding of the importance of adherence to treatment, reduction of co-payments and transport costs, and easier access to care, especially in rural areas.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColombiaComorbidityDelivery of Health CareDisease ManagementFemaleFocus GroupsHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID25909595
PMCPMC4409332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.