Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25909455›Full record

SynthesisActa orthopaedica2015

Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies.

Paul van der Voort, Bart G Pijls, Marc J Nieuwenhuijse, Jorrit Jasper, Marta Fiocco, Josepha W M Plevier, Saskia Middeldorp, Edward R Valstar, Rob G H H Nelissen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta orthopaedica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04064723 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Link LCU + Lima Delta TT vs DePuy Corail + Pinnacle. A Comparative Study of Stem and Cup Fixation and Polyethylene Wear

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2015 to 2033Enrolled100ConditionsOsteoarthritis, HipArmsRandomization between prosthetic components
NCT05773261 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Modern Surfaces of the Uncemented Cup in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Clinical Investigation Comparing Two Different Ultra-porous Coated Surfaces of Uncemented Cups Using CT-based Micromotion Analysis and Clinical Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2022 to 2039Enrolled70ConditionsOsteoarthritis, HipArmsMobilLINK TrabecuLINK cup, Pinnacle Gription cup
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2022
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Precision, Accuracy, and Observer Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Radiostereometric Analysis in Measuring Femoral Stem Migration In Vitro.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  18. Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul van der Voorta 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Imaging Group , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Bart G Pijlsa 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Imaging Group , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Marc J Nieuwenhuijsea 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Imaging Group , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Jorrit Jaspera 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Imaging Group , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Marta Fioccod 4 Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Josepha W M Plevierc 3 Walaeus Library.
Saskia Middeldorpe 5 Academic Medical Center, Department of Vascular Medicine , Amsterdam.
Edward R Valstara 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Imaging Group , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Rob G H H Nelissena 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Imaging Group , Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLWalsh University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFew studies have addressed the association between early migration of femoral stems and late aseptic revision in total hip arthroplasty. We performed a meta-regression analysis on 2 parallel systematic reviews and meta-analyses to determine the association between early migration and late aseptic revision of femoral stems. PATIENTS AND

methodsOf the 2 reviews, one covered early migration data obtained from radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies and the other covered long-term aseptic revision rates obtained from survival studies with endpoint revision for aseptic loosening. Stems were stratified according to the design concept: cemented shape-closed, cemented force-closed, and uncemented. A weighted regression model was used to assess the association between early migration and late aseptic revision, and to correct for confounders. Thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable migration were determined in accordance with the national joint registries (≤ 5% revision at 10 years) and the NICE criteria (≤ 10% revision at 10 years).

results24 studies (731 stems) were included in the RSA review and 56 studies (20,599 stems) were included in the survival analysis review. Combining both reviews for the 3 design concepts showed that for every 0.1-mm increase in 2-year subsidence, as measured with RSA, there was a 4% increase in revision rate for the shape-closed stem designs. This association remained after correction for age, sex, diagnosis, hospital type, continent, and study quality. The threshold for acceptable migration of shape-closed designs was defined at 0.15 mm; stems subsiding less than 0.15 mm in 2 years had revision rates of less than 5% at 10 years, while stems exceeding 0.15 mm subsidence had revision rates of more than 5%.

interpretationThere was a clinically relevant association between early subsidence of shape-closed femoral stems and late revision for aseptic loosening. This association can be used to assess the safety of shape-closed stem designs. The published research is not sufficient to allow us to make any conclusions regarding such an association for the force-closed and uncemented stems.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureArthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisHumansProsthesis DesignRadiostereometric AnalysisReoperationRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25909455
PMCPMC4564780
OpenAlexW2139381411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.