Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25909406›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Ketamine/propofol admixture (ketofol) at induction in the critically ill against etomidate (KEEP PACE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Nathan J Smischney, Sumedh S Hoskote, Alice Gallo de Moraes, Carlos J Racedo Africano, Perliveh M Carrera, Rudy Tedja, Jasleen K Pannu, Elizabeth C Hassebroek, Dereddi Raja S Reddy, Richard F Hinds and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02105415 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Ketamine / Propofol Admixture "Ketofol" at Induction in the Critically Ill Against Etomidate: KEEP PACE Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2014 to 2018Enrolled160ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsKetamine / Propofol Admixture, Etomidate
NCT04816162 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Ketofol vs Dexmedetomidine for Preventing Post-operative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Intestinal Obstruction Surgeries. A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsDelirium on EmergenceArmsketofol, dexmedetomidine, normal saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan J SmischneyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Smischney.nathan@mayo.edu.
Sumedh S HoskoteDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Hoskote.sumedh@mayo.edu.
Alice Gallo de MoraesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. gallodemoraes.alice@mayo.edu.
Carlos J Racedo AfricanoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. racedoafricano.carlos@mayo.edu.
Perliveh M CarreraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Carrera.perliveh@mayo.edu.
Rudy TedjaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Tedja.rudy@mayo.edu.
Jasleen K PannuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. pannu.jasleen@mayo.edu.
Elizabeth C HassebroekDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Hassebroek.elizabeth@mayo.edu.
Dereddi Raja S ReddyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. reddy.dereddiraja@mayo.edu.
Richard F HindsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. hinds.richard@mayo.edu.
Lokendra ThakurDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA, 17822, USA. lokendrat2001@gmail.com.
Mayo Clinic · USGeisinger Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndotracheal intubation (ETI) is commonly performed as a life-saving procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is often associated with significant hemodynamic perturbations and can severely impact the outcome of ICU patients. Etomidate is often chosen by many critical care providers for the patients who are hypotensive because of its superior hemodynamic profile compared to other induction medications. However, recent evidence has raised concerns about the increased incidence of adrenal insufficiency and mortality associated with etomidate use. A combination of ketamine and propofol (known as ketofol) has been studied in various settings as an alternative induction agent. In recent years, studies have shown that this combination may provide adequate sedation while maintaining hemodynamic stability, based on the balancing of the hemodynamic effects of these two individual agents. We hypothesized that ketofol may offer a valuable alternative to etomidate in critically ill patients with or without hemodynamic instability. METHODS/

designA randomized controlled parallel-group clinical trial of adult critically ill patients admitted to either a medical or surgical ICU at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN will be conducted. As part of planned emergency research, informed consent will be waived after appropriate community consultation and notification. Patients undergoing urgent or emergent ETI will receive either etomidate or a 1:1 admixture of ketamine and propofol (ketofol). The primary outcome will be hemodynamic instability during the first 15 minutes following drug administration. Secondary outcomes will include ICU length of stay, mortality, adrenal function, ventilator-free days and vasoactive medication use, among others. The planned sample size is 160 total patients. DISCUSSION: The overall goal of this trial is to assess the hemodynamic consequences of a ketamine-propofol combination used in critically ill patients undergoing urgent or emergent ETI compared to etomidate, a medication with an established hemodynamic profile. The trial will address a crucial gap in the literature regarding the optimal induction agent for ETI in patients that may have potential or established hemodynamic instability. Greater experience with planned emergency research will, hopefully, pave the way for future prospective randomized clinical trials in the critically ill population.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT02105415. 31 March 2014.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealAdrenal GlandsAnesthetics, CombinedAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, IntravenousClinical ProtocolsCritical IllnessEtomidateHemodynamicsHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsKetamineLength of StayMinnesotaPropofolAnesthetics, CombinedAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, IntravenousEtomidateKetaminePropofolVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID25909406
PMCPMC4409710
OpenAlexW2095356455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.