ArticleIranian journal of public health2014
Research's Practice and Barriers of Knowledge Translation in Iran.
Article in Iranian journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03896672 (How To Use Non-Invasive Positive Airway Pressure In Pleural Effusion Drainage), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
How To Use Non-Invasive Positive Airway Pressure In Pleural Effusion Drainage: Protocol For Implementation Multicentric Scientific Evidence With Audit
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge Management Implementation and the Tools Utilized in Healthcare for Evidence-Based Decision Making: A Systematic Review.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2017Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to the institutionalization and sustainability of knowledge translation platforms in the eastern Mediterranean: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Use of continuous positive airway pressure in drainage of pleural effusion: Educational intervention for evidence-based practice.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- Policy options for strengthening evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: overall SASHA project findings.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Article
- Structural barriers to knowledge transfer and exchange among men and women in low-, middle- and high-income countries: an international cross-sectional study with vaccine researchers in 44 countries.Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
- Knowledge Translation Improvement Strategies in Universities of Medical Sciences in Iran: A Qualitative Study.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2021Article
- The hepatitis C virus in Iran: health policy, historical, ethical issues and future challenges.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Assessment of research systems in universal health coverage-related organizations.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2018Article
- A descriptive qualitative examination of knowledge translation practice among health researchers in Manitoba, Canada.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- An assessment of health research impact in Iran.Health research policy and systems · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge Translation is a process that includes synthesis, dissemination, exchange and application of knowledge to improve the health, services and products In this study we have attempted to examine the knowledge translation practice and its perceived barriers on the universalities and research institutes (research sector) in Iran.
methodsBoth qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. In the quantitative section, a questionnaire had prepared for this study was completed by 88 authors country wide from randomly selected papers. In the qualitative section 13 in-depth interviews and 6 focus group discussions were held with managers and policy makers, clinical and health service providers, and researchers.
resultsTwenty four percent of the authors had no interaction whatsoever with the target audience. Lack of expectation toward creating change in the target audience, researchers' incentives, low level of trust among researchers and decision makers, absence of a predefined mechanism for delivery of research results and inappropriate research priorities were among the most important barriers identified in the qualitative section.
conclusionTranslation of research findings into some concrete outputs which can affect health of people is not in mandate of researchers and subsequently they are not prepared for this as well. Based on the barriers identified, it seems that the following interventions are necessary: cooperation among policy makers at macro and meso (organizational) level and the research sector; establishing networks for researchers and decision makers in choosing the research topic, priority setting, and building trust among researchers and policy makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25909064PMC4401061W2167993766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.