Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25909040›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2015

Optical sectioning and 3D reconstructions as an alternative to scanning electron microscopy for analysis of cell shape.

Jacob B Landis, Kayla L Ventura, Douglas E Soltis, Pamela S Soltis, David G Oppenheimer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob B LandisDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, 876 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA ; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Kayla L VenturaFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Douglas E SoltisDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, 876 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA ; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
David G OppenheimerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, 876 Newell Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
University of Florida · USFlorida Museum of Natural History · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premise of the studyVisualizing flower epidermal cells is often desirable for investigating the interaction between flowers and their pollinators, in addition to the broader range of ecological interactions in which flowers are involved. We developed a protocol for visualizing petal epidermal cells without the limitations of the commonly used method of scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

methodsFlower material was collected and fixed in glutaraldehyde, followed by dehydration in an ethanol series. Flowers were dissected to collect petals, and subjected to a Histo-Clear series to remove the cuticle. Material was then stained with aniline blue, mounted on microscope slides, and imaged using a compound fluorescence microscope to obtain optical sections that were reconstructed into a 3D image.

resultsThis optical sectioning method yielded high-quality images of the petal epidermal cells with virtually no damage to cells. Flowers were processed in larger batches than are possible using common SEM methods. Also, flower size was not a limiting factor as often observed in SEM studies. Flowers up to 5 cm in length were processed and mounted for visualization.

conclusionsThis method requires no special equipment for sample preparation prior to imaging and should be seen as an alternative method to SEM.

Indexed as

confocal microscopyfluorescencemorphologyoptical sectioningpetal cells

Identifiers

PMID25909040
PMCPMC4406833
OpenAlexW2119726435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.