Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25909039›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2015

Natural variation in teosinte at the domestication locus teosinte branched1 (tb1).

Laura Vann, Thomas Kono, Tanja Pyhäjärvi, Matthew B Hufford, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hybrid origin and phenotype evolution of the modern maize.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  3. An ancient origin of the naked grains of maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura VannDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
Thomas KonoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California , Davis, CA , USA ; Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota , Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN , USA.
Tanja PyhäjärviDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California , Davis, CA , USA ; Department of Biology, University of Oulu , Oulu , Finland.
Matthew B HuffordDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California , Davis, CA , USA ; Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University , Ames, Iowa , USA.
Jeffrey Ross-IbarraDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California , Davis, CA , USA ; Center for Population Biology and Genome Center, University of California , Davis, CA , USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The teosinte branched1(tb1) gene is a major QTL controlling branching differences between maize and its wild progenitor, teosinte. The insertion of a transposable element (Hopscotch) upstream of tb1 is known to enhance the gene's expression, causing reduced tillering in maize. Observations of the maize tb1 allele in teosinte and estimates of an insertion age of the Hopscotch that predates domestication led us to investigate its prevalence and potential role in teosinte. We assessed the prevalence of the Hopscotch element across an Americas-wide sample of 837 maize and teosinte individuals using a co-dominant PCR assay. Additionally, we calculated population genetic summaries using sequence data from a subset of individuals from four teosinte populations and collected phenotypic data using seed from a single teosinte population where Hopscotch was found segregating at high frequency. Genotyping results indicate the Hopscotch element is found in a number of teosinte populations and linkage disequilibrium near tb1 does not support recent introgression from maize. Population genetic signatures are consistent with selection on the tb1 locus, revealing a potential ecological role, but a greenhouse experiment does not detect a strong association between the Hopscotch and tillering in teosinte. Our findings suggest the role of Hopscotch differs between maize and teosinte. Future work should assess tb1 expression levels in teosinte with and without the Hopscotch and more comprehensively phenotype teosinte to assess the ecological significance of the Hopscotch insertion and, more broadly, the tb1 locus in teosinte.

Indexed as

DomesticationMaizeTeosinteTeosinte branched1Transposable element

Identifiers

PMID25909039
PMCPMC4406365
OpenAlexW2201624467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.