Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25908792›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2015

Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Facilitating Education about Live Kidney Donation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Jane C Tan, Elisa J Gordon, Mary Amanda Dew, Dianne LaPointe Rudow, Robert W Steiner, E Steve Woodle, Rebecca Hays, James R Rodrigue, Dorry L Segev, American Society of Transplantation

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contextual factors of implementing APOL1 genetic testing into living kidney donor clinical evaluation.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The true risk of living kidney donation.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2019
    Review
  16. A National Survey of Transplant Surgeons and Nephrologists on ImplementingProgress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. African American Living Donors' Attitudes About APOL1 Genetic Testing: A Mixed Methods Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Article
  19. Assessing Living Donor Priorities Through Nominal Group Technique.Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Jane C TanDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California; janetan@stanford.edu.
Elisa J GordonCenter for Healthcare Studies and Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois;
Mary Amanda DewDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
Dianne LaPointe RudowRecanati Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York;
Robert W SteinerDepartment of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California;
E Steve WoodleDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio;
Rebecca HaysTransplant Center, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin;
James R RodrigueTransplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Dorry L SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
American Society of Transplantation
Harvard University Press · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Long-Term Health Outcomes After Live Kidney Donation in African AmericansR01DK096008 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
Kidney Donor Outcomes Cohort (KDOC) StudyR01DK085185 · NIDDK · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MANDELBROT, DIDIER A, RODRIGUE, JAMES R · 2011 to 2014
$2.8M
A2ALL Cohort Study: Pyschosocial and Surgical OutcomesU01DK085587 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HUMAR, ABHINAV · 2009 to 2014
$1.8M
A Randomized Trial and Reduce to Disparity in Live Donor Kidney TransplantationR01DK079665 · NIDDK · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODRIGUE, JAMES R · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
House Calls and Decision Support: Increasing Access to Live Donor TransplantationR01DK098727 · NIDDK · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODRIGUE, JAMES R · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
Patient Oriented Research in Kidney Disease and Transplant SurgeryK24DK101828 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2014 to 2018
$922k
Renal senescence in kidney donorsK23DK087937 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TAN, JANE C · 2010 to 2014
$892k
Optimizing Kidney Transplant Patients' Informed Consent for Increased Risk DonorsR21NR013660 · NINR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GORDON, ELISA J · 2012 to 2013
$424k
Quality of Informed Consent for Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver TransplantationR03DK091786 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GORDON, ELISA J · 2011 to 2012
$153k
NIDDK NIH HHS 5K23-DK87937NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK087937NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK101828NIDDK NIH HHS K24-DK101828NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079665NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK079665NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085185NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK085185NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK096008NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK096008NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098727NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK091786NIDDK NIH HHS R03-DK091786NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085587NIDDK NIH HHS U01-DK085587NINR NIH HHS R21 NR013660NINR NIH HHS R21-NR013660OSTLTS CDC HHS R39-OT22059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Best Practice in Live Kidney Donation Consensus Conference held in June of 2014 included the Best Practices in Living Donor Education Workgroup, whose charge was to identify best practice strategies in education of living donors, community outreach initiatives, commercial media, solicitation, and state registries. The workgroup's goal was to identify critical content to include in living kidney donor education and best methods to deliver educational content. A detailed summary of considerations regarding educational content issues for potential living kidney donors is presented, including the consensus that was reached. Educational topics that may require updating on the basis of emerging studies on living kidney donor health outcomes are also presented. Enhancing the educational process is important for increasing living donor comprehension to optimize informed decision-making.

Indexed as

Health EducationAmbulatory Care FacilitiesConsensusEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInformed ConsentKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsNephrologyPatient Education as TopicRenal DialysisRisk AssessmentTime FactorsTransplant Recipientseducationinformed consentkidney donorliving donor

Identifiers

PMID25908792
PMCPMC4559504
OpenAlexW2083502511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.