Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25908457›Full record

Trial reportStroke2015

Patterns of poststroke brain damage that predict speech production errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia dissociate.

Alexandra Basilakos, Chris Rorden, Leonardo Bonilha, Dana Moser, Julius Fridriksson

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effective neural connectivity deficits during speech auditory feedback processing in post-stroke aphasia: An fMRI study.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025
    Article
  12. A Novel Candidate Neuromarker of Central Motor Dysfunction in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Decoding speech intent from non-frontal cortical areas.Journal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The speech neuroprosthesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra BasilakosFrom the Aphasia Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (A.B., J.F.), Department of Psychology (C.R.), University of South Carolina, Columbia; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (L.B.); and Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham (D.M.).
Chris RordenFrom the Aphasia Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (A.B., J.F.), Department of Psychology (C.R.), University of South Carolina, Columbia; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (L.B.); and Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham (D.M.).
Leonardo BonilhaFrom the Aphasia Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (A.B., J.F.), Department of Psychology (C.R.), University of South Carolina, Columbia; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (L.B.); and Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham (D.M.).
Dana MoserFrom the Aphasia Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (A.B., J.F.), Department of Psychology (C.R.), University of South Carolina, Columbia; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (L.B.); and Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham (D.M.).
Julius FridrikssonFrom the Aphasia Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (A.B., J.F.), Department of Psychology (C.R.), University of South Carolina, Columbia; Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (L.B.); and Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham (D.M.). jfridrik@sc.edu.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
Neural Predictors of Anomia Recovery in AphasiaR01DC008355 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
A Unified Neuroanatomical Model of Speech Production and Perception: ImplicationsR01DC009571 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS, RORDEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008355NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009571NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAcquired apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder caused by brain damage. AOS often co-occurs with aphasia, a language disorder in which patients may also demonstrate speech production errors. The overlap of speech production deficits in both disorders has raised questions on whether AOS emerges from a unique pattern of brain damage or as a subelement of the aphasic syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine whether speech production errors in AOS and aphasia are associated with distinctive patterns of brain injury.

methodsForty-three patients with history of a single left-hemisphere stroke underwent comprehensive speech and language testing. The AOS Rating Scale was used to rate speech errors specific to AOS versus speech errors that can also be associated with both AOS and aphasia. Localized brain damage was identified using structural magnetic resonance imaging, and voxel-based lesion-impairment mapping was used to evaluate the relationship between speech errors specific to AOS, those that can occur in AOS or aphasia, and brain damage.

resultsThe pattern of brain damage associated with AOS was most strongly associated with damage to cortical motor regions, with additional involvement of somatosensory areas. Speech production deficits that could be attributed to AOS or aphasia were associated with damage to the temporal lobe and the inferior precentral frontal regions.

conclusionsAOS likely occurs in conjunction with aphasia because of the proximity of the brain areas supporting speech and language, but the neurobiological substrate for each disorder differs.

Indexed as

AphasiaApraxiasBrain InjuriesStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor Cortexaphasiaapraxia, articulatoryneuroimagingstroke

Identifiers

PMID25908457
PMCPMC4442076
OpenAlexW2070150579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.