Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25908317›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Fine-Tuning of the Actin Cytoskeleton and Cell Adhesion During Drosophila Development by the Unconventional Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors Myoblast City and Sponge.

Bridget Biersmith, Zong-Heng Wang, Erika R Geisbrecht

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tissue-specific dynamic codon redefinition inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. The Crk adapter protein is essential forMolecular biology of the cell · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Membrane fusion in muscle development and repair.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bridget BiersmithDivision of Cell Biology and Biophysics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Zong-Heng WangDivision of Cell Biology and Biophysics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri 64110.
Erika R GeisbrechtDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506 geisbrechte@ksu.edu.
University of Missouri–Kansas City · USKansas State University · US

Funding

Mechanisms Underlying Muscle Development in DrosophilaR01AR060788 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI Erika Rae Geisbrecht · 2012 to 2026
$4.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060788NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR060788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionarily conserved Dock proteins function as unconventional guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs). Upon binding to engulfment and cell motility (ELMO) proteins, Dock-ELMO complexes activate the Rho family of small GTPases to mediate a diverse array of biological processes, including cell motility, apoptotic cell clearance, and axon guidance. Overlapping expression patterns and functional redundancy among the 11 vertebrate Dock family members, which are subdivided into four families (Dock A, B, C, and D), complicate genetic analysis. In both vertebrate and invertebrate systems, the actin dynamics regulator, Rac, is the target GTPase of the Dock-A subfamily. However, it remains unclear whether Rac or Rap1 are the in vivo downstream GTPases of the Dock-B subfamily. Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent genetic model organism for understanding Dock protein function as its genome encodes one ortholog per subfamily: Myoblast city (Mbc; Dock A) and Sponge (Spg; Dock B). Here we show that the roles of Spg and Mbc are not redundant in the Drosophila somatic muscle or the dorsal vessel. Moreover, we confirm the in vivo role of Mbc upstream of Rac and provide evidence that Spg functions in concert with Rap1, possibly to regulate aspects of cell adhesion. Together these data show that Mbc and Spg can have different downstream GTPase targets. Our findings predict that the ability to regulate downstream GTPases is dependent on cellular context and allows for the fine-tuning of actin cytoskeletal or cell adhesion events in biological processes that undergo cell morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionActin CytoskeletonAnimalsCarrier ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Knockout TechniquesGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsMorphogenesisMusclesMutationPhenotypeProtein Bindingrac1 GTP-Binding Proteinrap1 GTP-Binding ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange Factorsmbc protein, Drosophilarac1 GTP-Binding Proteinrap1 GTP-Binding ProteinsSpg protein, DrosophilaDock proteinsdorsal vesselDrosophilaGTPasemusculature

Identifiers

PMID25908317
PMCPMC4492379
OpenAlexW1998193414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.