Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25907992›Full record

Trial reportLa Radiologia medica2015

Four-dimensional computed tomography in accelerated partial breast irradiation planning: single series from a phase III trial.

Icro Meattini, Livia Marrazzo, Margherita Zani, Fabiola Paiar, Stefania Pallotta, Gabriele Simontacchi, Marta Bucciolini, Lorenzo Livi

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in La Radiologia medica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Partial breast irradiation for early breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Icro MeattiniRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. icro.meattini@unifi.it.
Livia MarrazzoMedical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Margherita ZaniUniversity of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Fabiola PaiarRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Stefania PallottaMedical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Gabriele SimontacchiRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Marta BuccioliniMedical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo G. A. Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of the four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) in accelerated partial breast irradiation (aPBI) planning. MATERIALS AND

methodsAt our Institute, we have been treating the index quadrant with external intensity-modulated radiation therapy in a phase III trial. For this study, we selected a sample of 10 patients with right- or left-sided breast cancer and surgical clips at the excision site. Contouring of the target was performed both using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) and 4DCT imaging. On both 3DCT and 4DCT, we recorded the clinical target volume (CTV) and the planning target volume (PTV) and the coordinates of the PTV centroid. We calculated the treatment plans, according to our protocol, using the contours drawn on the 3DCT and 4DCT and evaluated target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OAR).

resultsMedian age of the patients was 63.5 years (range 52-75). The comparison between the 3DCT and 4DCT PTV volumes was not statistically significant (p = 0.79). Concerning centroid coordinates, the average absolute differences were 0.1 mm in the latero-lateral, 0.7 mm in the antero-posterior and 0.3 mm in the supero-inferior direction. No statistically significant differences were observed both in PTV coverage and OAR sparing; the 4D PTV contour is adequately covered when the plan based on the 3D contours is used. Target coverage was reduced on average by 1 % and no statistically significant difference was observed (p = 0.93).

conclusionsIn our experience, no significant differences between PTV volumes, PTV coverage, OAR sparing and centroid position are evidenced when comparing 3DCT and 4DCT plans. Conventional 3DCT-based planning is adequate for aPBI.

Indexed as

Four-Dimensional Computed TomographyAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedBreast cancerBreathing motionFour-dimensional computed tomographyIMRTPartial breast irradiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.