Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25907744›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2015

Age-related differences in conditioned pain modulation of sensitizing and desensitizing trends during response dependent stimulation.

Kelly M Naugle, Yenisel Cruz-Almeida, Charles J Vierck, Andre P Mauderli, Joseph L Riley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The silent epidemic of chronic pain in older adults.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Age-Dependent Changes in the Inflammatory Nociceptive Behavior of Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelly M NauglePain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, P.O. Box 103628, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Electronic address: kmnaugle@iupui.edu.
Yenisel Cruz-AlmeidaPain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Charles J VierckDepartment of Neuroscience, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, P.O. Box 103628, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Andre P MauderliNeuroanalytics Corporation, 3700 NW 91st St. C200, Gainesville, FL 32606, USA.
Joseph L RileyPain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, P.O. Box 103628, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
The Effects of Aging on Experimental Models of Pain Inhibition and FacilitationR01AG039659 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RILEY, JOSEPH L · 2011 to 2016
$3.0M
Integrative and translational training in pain researchT32NS045551 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI YEZIERSKI, ROBERT P. · 2005 to 2014
$1.8M
Neuroimaging Age-Related Changes i Pain ModulationK01AG048259 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CRUZ-ALMEIDA, YENISEL · 2015 to 2019
$831k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG048259NIA NIH HHS L30 AG043172NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039659NIA NIH HHS R01AG039659NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS045551NINDS NIH HHS T32 T32NS045551-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study evaluated age differences in conditioned pain modulation using a test stimulus that provided the opportunity to evaluate changes in heat pain sensitivity, sensitization, and desensitization within the same paradigm. During this psychophysical test, pain intensity clamping uses REsponse Dependent STIMulation (REDSTIM) methodology to automatically adjust stimulus intensity to maintain a desired pain rating set-point. Specifically, stimulus intensity increases until a pre-defined pain rating (the setpoint) is exceeded, and then decreases until pain ratings fall below the setpoint, with continued increases and decreases dictated by ratings. The subjects are blinded in terms of the setpoint and stimulus intensities. Younger and older subjects completed two test sessions of two REDSTIM trials, with presentation of conditioning cold stimulation between the trials of one session but not the other. The results indicated that conditioning cold stimulation similarly decreased the overall sensitivity of younger and older subjects, as measured by the average temperature that maintained a setpoint rating of 20 (on a scale of 0-100). The conditioning stimulus also significantly enhanced sensitization following ascending stimulus progressions and desensitization following descending stimulus progressions in older subjects relative to younger subjects. Thus, older subjects experienced greater swings in sensitivity in response to varying levels of painful stimulation. These results are discussed in terms of control over pain intensity by descending central modulatory systems. These findings potentially shed new light on the central control over descending inhibition and facilitation of pain.

Indexed as

NociceptionAdultAgedAge FactorsCold TemperatureConditioning, PsychologicalFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPhysical StimulationPsychophysicsAgingOlder adultsPain inhibitionPain modulationPain sensitivityResponse dependent stimulation (REDSTIM)

Identifiers

PMID25907744
PMCPMC4484852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.