ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2015
Proceedings of the Cardiac PET Summit, 12 May 2014, Baltimore, MD : 3: Quantitation of myocardial blood flow.
Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Review
- Diagnostic performance of the quantification of myocardium at risk from MPI SPECT/CTA 2G fusion for detecting obstructive coronary disease: A multicenter trial.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Accurate myocardial blood flow measurements: Quality from start to finish is key to success.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Measurement of MBF by PET is ready for prime time as an integral part of clinical reports in diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD : For prime time not yet: Need impact and certainty.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Multi-modality imaging: Bird's eye view from the 2016 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Review
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in women with nonobstructive ischemic heart disease as assessed by positron emission tomography.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2017Review
- Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25907353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.