Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25907219›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2015

Mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Cynthia X Ma, Tomás Reinert, Izabela Chmielewska, Matthew J Ellis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 230 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
230citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
35.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

230 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 417 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant MK-2206, an AKT Inhibitor, with Anastrozole in Clinical Stage II or IIIClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

170 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cynthia X MaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Tomás ReinertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Praça da Cruz Vermelha, 23, 20230-130, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Izabela ChmielewskaDepartment of Pneumonology, Oncology and Allergology, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8 St., 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Matthew J EllisLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston 77030, Texas, USA.
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

NOVEL BIOMARKERS FOR AROMATASE INHIBITOR THERAPYR01CA095614 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELLIS, MATTHEW J, LUO, JINGQIN · 2003 to 2013
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oestrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) breast cancer is a major cause of cancer death in women. Although aromatase inhibitors suppress the function of ER and reduce the risk of recurrence, therapeutic resistance is common and essentially inevitable in advanced disease. This Review considers both genomic and cell biological explanations as to why ER(+) breast cancer cells persist, progress and cause an incurable, lethal, systemic disease. The design and outcomes of clinical trials are considered with the perspective that resistance mechanisms are heterogeneous, and therefore biomarker and somatic mutation-based stratification and eligibility will be essential for improvements in patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMutationReceptors, EstrogenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID25907219
OpenAlexW1992533338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.