Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25907113›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2015

Giving structure to the biofilm matrix: an overview of individual strategies and emerging common themes.

Laura Hobley, Catriona Harkins, Cait E MacPhee, Nicola R Stanley-Wall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 279 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
279citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

279 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A biofilm-derived peptide as an underwater adhesive.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unlocking the potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. EnteroaggregativeEcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

219 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura HobleyDivision of Molecular Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Catriona HarkinsDivision of Molecular Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Cait E MacPheeJames Clerk Maxwell Building, School of Physics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK.
Nicola R Stanley-WallDivision of Molecular Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK n.r.stanleywall@dundee.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I019464/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L006804/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L006979/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are communities of microbial cells that underpin diverse processes including sewage bioremediation, plant growth promotion, chronic infections and industrial biofouling. The cells resident in the biofilm are encased within a self-produced exopolymeric matrix that commonly comprises lipids, proteins that frequently exhibit amyloid-like properties, eDNA and exopolysaccharides. This matrix fulfils a variety of functions for the community, from providing structural rigidity and protection from the external environment to controlling gene regulation and nutrient adsorption. Critical to the development of novel strategies to control biofilm infections, or the capability to capitalize on the power of biofilm formation for industrial and biotechnological uses, is an in-depth knowledge of the biofilm matrix. This is with respect to the structure of the individual components, the nature of the interactions between the molecules and the three-dimensional spatial organization. We highlight recent advances in the understanding of the structural and functional role that carbohydrates and proteins play within the biofilm matrix to provide three-dimensional architectural integrity and functionality to the biofilm community. We highlight, where relevant, experimental techniques that are allowing the boundaries of our understanding of the biofilm matrix to be extended using Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholerae, and Bacillus subtilis as exemplars.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiofilmsAdhesins, BacterialCelluloseExtracellular MatrixFlagellaProtein TransportAdhesins, BacterialCelluloseamyloid fibresBacillus subtilisbiofilm matrix assemblybiophysicsEscherichia colihydrophobinStaphylococcus aureusVibrio cholerae

Identifiers

PMID25907113
PMCPMC4551309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.