ArticleBiomaterials2015
A transient cell-shielding method for viable MSC delivery within hydrophobic scaffolds polymerized in situ.
Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The hydrocup: a hollow electrospun scaffold forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Applied Bioengineering in Tissue Reconstruction, Replacement, and Regeneration.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2019Review
- Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2019Article
- Empowering Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Ocular Degenerative Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Article
- Biomimetic polyurethane/TiOMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications · 2018Article
- Local Delivery of PHD2 siRNA from ROS-Degradable Scaffolds to Promote Diabetic Wound Healing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2016Article
- Design of Injectable Materials to Improve Stem Cell Transplantation.Current stem cell reports · 2016Article
- The Bone Microenvironment: a Fertile Soil for Tumor Growth.Current osteoporosis reports · 2016Review
- Oxidatively Degradable Poly(thioketal urethane)/Ceramic Composite Bone Cements with Bone-Like Strength.RSC advances · 2016Article
- Tissue-engineered 3D cancer-in-bone modeling: silk and PUR protocols.BoneKEy reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-based therapies have emerged as promising approaches for regenerative medicine. Hydrophobic poly(ester urethane)s offer the advantages of robust mechanical properties, cell attachment without the use of peptides, and controlled degradation by oxidative and hydrolytic mechanisms. However, the application of injectable hydrophobic polymers to cell delivery is limited by the challenges of protecting cells from reaction products and creating a macroporous architecture post-cure. We designed injectable carriers for cell delivery derived from reactive, hydrophobic polyisocyanate and polyester triol precursors. To overcome cell death caused by reaction products from in situ polymerization, we encapsulated bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) in fastdegrading, oxidized alginate beads prior to mixing with the hydrophobic precursors. Cells survived the polymerization at >70% viability, and rapid dissolution of oxidized alginate beads after the scaffold cured created interconnected macropores that facilitated cellular adhesion to the scaffold in vitro. Applying this injectable system to deliver BMSCs to rat excisional skin wounds showed that the scaffolds supported survival of transplanted cells and infiltration of host cells, which improved new tissue formation compared to both implanted, pre-formed scaffolds seeded with cells and acellular controls. Our design is the first to enable injectable delivery of settable, hydrophobic scaffolds where cell encapsulation provides a mechanism for both temporary cytoprotection during polymerization and rapid formation of macropores post-polymerization. This simple approach provides potential advantages for cell delivery relative to hydrogel technologies, which have weaker mechanical properties and require incorporation of peptides to achieve cell adhesion and degradability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.