Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25906747›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

The prognostic value of the stem-like group in colorectal cancer using a panel of immunohistochemistry markers.

Chee Wee Ong, Pei Yi Chong, Darragh G McArt, Jason Yongsheng Chan, Hwee Tong Tan, Alan Prem Kumar, Maxey C M Chung, Marie-Véronique Clément, Richie Soong, Sandra Van Schaeybroeck and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. LGR5, HES1 and ATOH1 in Young Rectal Cancer Patients in Egyptian.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of prostanoids in gastrointestinal cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chee Wee OngCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Pei Yi ChongCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Darragh G McArtCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Jason Yongsheng ChanDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Hwee Tong TanDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Alan Prem KumarCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Maxey C M ChungDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Marie-Véronique ClémentDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Richie SoongCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Sandra Van SchaeybroeckCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
David J J WaughCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Patrick G JohnstonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Philip D DunneCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Manuel Salto-TellezCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland.
National University of Singapore · SGNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13172Cancer Research UK 20256Medical Research Council MR/J007641/1Prostate Cancer UK CEO13_2-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. It is becoming increasingly clear that CRC is a diverse disease, as exemplified by the identification of subgroups of CRC tumours that are driven by distinct biology. Recently, a number of studies have begun to define panels of diagnostically relevant markers to align patients into individual subgroups in an attempt to give information on prognosis and treatment response. We examined the immunohistochemical expression profile of 18 markers, each representing a putative role in cancer development, in 493 primary colorectal carcinomas using tissue microarrays. Through unsupervised clustering in stage II cancers, we identified two cluster groups that are broadly defined by inflammatory or immune-related factors (CD3, CD8, COX-2 and FOXP3) and stem-like factors (CD44, LGR5, SOX2, OCT4). The expression of the stem-like group markers was associated with a significantly worse prognosis compared to cases with lower expression. In addition, patients classified in the stem-like subgroup displayed a trend towards a benefit from adjuvant treatment. The biologically relevant and poor prognostic stem-like group could also be identified in early stage I cancers, suggesting a potential opportunity for the identification of aggressive tumors at a very early stage of the disease.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCluster AnalysisColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkerscancer stem-cellcarcinomacolorectalimmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID25906747
PMCPMC4494972
OpenAlexW1907993398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.