ReviewCNS drugs2015
Glatiramer Acetate 40 mg/mL in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Review.
Review in CNS drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of the Intestinal Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis-Lessons to Be Learned from Hippocrates.Biology · 2023Review
- An Overview of the History, Pathophysiology, and Pharmacological Interventions of Multiple Sclerosis.Cureus · 2023Review
- A window of opportunity trial evaluating intratumoral injection of Copaxone® in patients with percutaneously accessible tumors.Translational medicine communications · 2023Article
- Differential Effects of MS Therapeutics on B Cells-Implications for Their Use and Failure in AQP4-Positive NMOSD Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Nanopharmaceuticals and nanomedicines currently on the market: challenges and opportunities.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2019Review
- Atypical Post-Injection Reactions with Delayed Onset Following Glatiramer Acetate 40 mg: Need for Titration?CNS drugs · 2018Article
- Tolerability and Safety Profile of a New Brand-Generic Product of Glatiramer Acetate in Iranian Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Observational Cohort Study.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone(®)) is a synthetic analogue of myelin basic protein, which is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). The therapeutic effects of the drug in the treatment of MS are thought to be via immunomodulation and neuroprotection. Subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg/mL once daily is approved in several countries for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS. Recently, a high-concentration formulation of glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL administered three times weekly was approved in the USA and several European countries in the same indication. This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of the high-concentration regimen. In the randomized, phase III GALA study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL three times weekly reduced annualized relapse rates significantly more than placebo, and indirect comparisons indicate that the efficacy of the three-times-weekly regimen is similar to that of the 20 mg/mL once-daily regimen. Results of the randomized, phase IIIb GLACIER study in patients with RRMS demonstrated that the three-times-weekly regimen reduced the risk of injection-site reactions by 50 % and was associated with numerically greater patient convenience scores than the once-daily regimen. Thus, in the treatment of RRMS, glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL three times weekly is effective and provides a better tolerated and possibly more convenient option than the once-daily regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.