Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25906170›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2015

Enhanced ligand sampling for relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.

Joseph W Kaus, J Andrew McCammon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Alchemical Enhanced Sampling with Optimized Phase Space Overlap.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Binding Modes and Metabolism of Caffeine.Chemical research in toxicology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph W Kaus†Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,‡Center for Theoretical Biological Physics,¶Department of Pharmacology, and §Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0365, United States.
J Andrew McCammon†Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,‡Center for Theoretical Biological Physics,¶Department of Pharmacology, and §Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0365, United States.
Center for Theoretical Biological Physics · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

THEORY OF BIOMOLECULAR DIFFUSIONR01GM031749 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI HUBER, GARY ALEXANDER, MCCAMMON, JAMES ANDREW · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008326 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMIVES, ELIZABETH A. · 1989 to 2020
$7.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM031749NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031749NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008326NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM08326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free energy calculations are used to study how strongly potential drug molecules interact with their target receptors. The accuracy of these calculations depends on the accuracy of the molecular dynamics (MD) force field as well as proper sampling of the major conformations of each molecule. However, proper sampling of ligand conformations can be difficult when there are large barriers separating the major ligand conformations. An example of this is for ligands with an asymmetrically substituted phenyl ring, where the presence of protein loops hinders the proper sampling of the different ring conformations. These ring conformations become more difficult to sample when the size of the functional groups attached to the ring increases. The Adaptive Integration Method (AIM) has been developed, which adaptively changes the alchemical coupling parameter λ during the MD simulation so that conformations sampled at one λ can aid sampling at the other λ values. The Accelerated Adaptive Integration Method (AcclAIM) builds on AIM by lowering potential barriers for specific degrees of freedom at intermediate λ values. However, these methods may not work when there are very large barriers separating the major ligand conformations. In this work, we describe a modification to AIM that improves sampling of the different ring conformations, even when there is a very large barrier between them. This method combines AIM with conformational Monte Carlo sampling, giving improved convergence of ring populations and the resulting free energy. This method, called AIM/MC, is applied to study the relative binding free energy for a pair of ligands that bind to thrombin and a different pair of ligands that bind to aspartyl protease β-APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1). These protein-ligand binding free energy calculations illustrate the improvements in conformational sampling and the convergence of the free energy compared to both AIM and AcclAIM.

Indexed as

ThermodynamicsAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMonte Carlo MethodProtein BindingThrombinAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesBACE1 protein, humanLigandsThrombin

Identifiers

PMID25906170
PMCPMC4442669
OpenAlexW2057593004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.