Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25906073›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Essential Public Health Services' Accessibility and its Determinants among Adults with Chronic Diseases in China.

Miaomiao Tian, Heng Wang, Xuetao Tong, Kun Zhu, Xiaojuan Zhang, Xi Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nutrition Policy and Healthy China 2030 Building.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Miaomiao TianInstitute of Medical Information, Center for Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100020, China.
Heng WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China.
Xuetao TongGuiyang Medical University, Guiyang, 550004, Guizhou, China.
Kun ZhuInstitute of Medical Information, Center for Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xiaojuan ZhangInstitute of Medical Information, Center for Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xi ChenSchool of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhanjiang, 212013, Jiangsu, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNGuiyang Medical University · CNJiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlong with three years implementation of health reform in China, this study aimed at providing the up-to-date evidence about the accessibility of essential public health services (EPHS) among adults with chronic diseases (CDs) in both urban and rural areas, as well as determinants in access to EPHS.

methodsThe data were collected from a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2013, which used a multistage stratified random sampling method to select 54 urban communities and 54 rural villages. Hypertension patients and diabetes patients were the target population who are the main beneficiaries of EPHS. Single factor analysis of influencing factors on difference access to EPHS was performed by Chi-Square analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of effective management and effective control.

resultsPatients with hypertension or diabetes were predominantly middle-aged or older persons and had a mean age of 65.26 year. People with CDs in China have a higher basic accessibility rate in EPHS with more than 90% of them having experience in receiving EPHS. And those who are willing to receive services from doctors have the most positive influence on effective management and control in blood pressure or blood glucose. But unsatisfied quality and equity of EPHS still exist in primary health system. 90% of participants could receive EPHS, but just 44% of them could control their diseases effectively. And participants from cities had the higher rates in effective management (urban: rural = 57%: 50.6%) and effective control (urban: rural = 39.5%: 27.8%).

conclusionPeople with CDs have a high level in geography and economic accessibility to EPHS, but the effectiveness of health management also needs to be improved, especially for those living in rural areas. Our study highlights the continuing need for improving ability to provide EPHS and the equality among regions. Meanwhile, strengthen health education and promotion for patients with CDs to improve their willingness to receive EPHS is also highlighted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth Services AccessibilityHealth SurveysHumansHypertensionLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25906073
PMCPMC4408006
OpenAlexW2048060886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.