Trial reportAmerican journal of public health2015
Comparing the Relative Efficacy of Narrative vs Nonnarrative Health Messages in Reducing Health Disparities Using a Randomized Trial.
Trial report in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of Entertainment-Education interventions on persuasive health outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Video Interventions for Reducing Health Inequity in Cancer Screening Programmes: a Systematic Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Interventions for African American Women: Implications for Promoting Health Equity.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2024Pooled it
- Is tailored messaging more effective? An analysis of a digital health intervention to promote HPV vaccination intent among Latinx.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Trial
- Using Film to Disseminate Information on Cervical Cancer Prevention in Lusaka: Results from a Small Intervention Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019Trial
- Just a Spoonful of Sugar Helps the Messages Go Down: Using Stories and Vicarious Self-Affirmation to Reduce e-Cigarette Use.Health communication · 2019Trial
- Improving Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Intervention to Compare Screener vs. Survivor Narratives.Journal of health communication · 2019Trial
- A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2017Trial
- Perceptions of a Culturally Tailored Narrative Video for Skin Cancer Prevention Among Spanish-Speaking Hispanic Outdoor Workers: Exploratory Study.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Digital Storytelling Interventions to Promote Cancer Screening Among Hispanic/Latino Adults in Primary Care Settings.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Developing a Culturally Tailored Narrative Video for Skin Cancer Prevention Among Spanish-Speaking Hispanic Outdoor Workers: Co-Design Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- A Good Life with Impairment: Illuminating and Supporting the Experiences of Women Living With Cancer through Community-Based Art Workshops.Health promotion practice · 2026Article
- Health equity-oriented design for dissemination: products and impact of rapid community translation for COVID-19 vaccine promotion.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Improving Palliative Care Knowledge and Intentions Among Great Plains American Indians: Efficacy Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial Testing a Culture-Centric Palliative Care Message.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of culture and cognitive heuristics in assessing the credibility of cancer (mis)information on Facebook among U.S. Latinos/as.Health communication · 2025Article
- Gain-Framed Health Messaging, Medical Trust, and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Self-Efficacy: An Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- To Pause With a Cliffhanger or a Temporary Closure? The Differential Impact of Serial Versus Episodic Narratives on Children's Physical Activity Behaviors.Communication research · 2025Article
- Strategies to correct vaccine misinformation on social media for pregnant women and the impact of vaccine skepticism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Community engagement to develop a dialogue-drama on adolescent pregnancy in a marginalised migrant population on the Thailand-Myanmar border: an ethnographic approach to participatory action research.Global health action · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe compared the relative efficacy of a fictional narrative film to a more traditional nonnarrative film in conveying the same health information.
methodsWe used a random digit dial procedure to survey the cervical cancer-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of non-Hispanic White, Mexican American, and African American women, aged 25 to 45 years, living in Los Angeles, California, from 2011 to 2012. Participants (n = 704) were randomly assigned to view either a narrative or nonnarrative film containing the same information about how cervical cancer could be prevented or detected, and they were re-contacted 2 weeks and 6 months later.
resultsAt 2 weeks, both films produced a significant increase in cervical cancer-related knowledge and attitudes, but these effects were significantly higher for the narrative film. At 6 months, viewers of both films retained greater than baseline knowledge and more positive attitudes toward Papanicolaou (Pap) tests, but women who saw the narrative were significantly more likely to have had or scheduled a Pap test. The narrative was particularly effective for Mexican American women, eliminating cervical cancer screening disparities found at baseline.
conclusionsNarratives might prove to be a useful tool for reducing health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.