Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25905685›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

When are surface plasmon polaritons excited in the Kretschmann-Raether configuration?

Jonathan J Foley Iv, Hayk Harutyunyan, Daniel Rosenmann, Ralu Divan, Gary P Wiederrecht, Stephen K Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advanced mid-infrared lightsources above and beyond lasers and their analytical utility.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan J Foley IvCenter for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.
Hayk HarutyunyanCenter for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.
Daniel RosenmannCenter for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.
Ralu DivanCenter for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.
Gary P WiederrechtCenter for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.
Stephen K GrayCenter for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely believed that the reflection minimum in a Kretschmann-Raether experiment results from direct coupling into surface plasmon polariton modes. Our experimental results provide a surprising discrepancy between the leakage radiation patterns of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) launched on a layered gold/germanium film compared to the K-R minimum, clearly challenging this belief. We provide definitive evidence that the reflectance dip in K-R experiments does not correlate with excitation of an SPP mode, but rather corresponds to a particular type of perfectly absorbing (PA) mode. Results from rigorous electrodynamics simulations show that the PA mode can only exist under external driving, whereas the SPP can exist in regions free from direct interaction with the driving field. These simulations show that it is possible to indirectly excite propagating SPPs guided by the reflectance minimum in a K-R experiment, but demonstrate the efficiency can be lower by more than a factor of 3. We find that optimal coupling into the SPP can be guided by the square magnitude of the Fresnel transmission amplitude.

Identifiers

PMID25905685
PMCPMC4407725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.