Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25905586›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2015

Safety and Biologic Response of Pre-operative Autophagy Inhibition in Combination with Gemcitabine in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Brian A Boone, Nathan Bahary, Amer H Zureikat, A James Moser, Daniel P Normolle, Wen-Chi Wu, Aatur D Singhi, Phillip Bao, David L Bartlett, Lance A Liotta and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Targeting Lysosomes for Enhanced Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Immune Response.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian A BooneDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nathan BaharyDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Amer H ZureikatDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A James MoserInstitute for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel P NormolleDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Wen-Chi WuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Aatur D SinghiDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Phillip BaoDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David L BartlettDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lance A LiottaCenter for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Virginia EspinaCenter for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Patricia LoughranDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael T LotzeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. lotzemt@upmc.edu.
Herbert J ZehDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. zehxhx@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USGeorge Mason University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Postdoctoral Research Training in Biotherapy of CancerT32CA113263 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Udai S Kammula · 2006 to 2026
$3.6M
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is a disease of constitutive autophagyR01CA181450 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LOTZE, MICHAEL T, ZEH, HERBERT J · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS L30 CA170992NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P30CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181450NCI NIH HHS R01CA181450NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113263NCI NIH HHS T32CA113263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutophagy is a cell survival mechanism that plays a critical role in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Murine studies have previously demonstrated that treatment with the late-autophagy inhibitor chloroquine in combination with chemotherapy limited tumor growth.

methodsIn this phase 1/2 trial, we examined treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and gemcitabine for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, evaluated by Storer's dose escalation design. Secondary endpoints were CA 19-9 biomarker response, R0 resection rates, survival, and correlative studies of autophagy.

resultsThirty-five patients were enrolled. There were no dose-limiting toxicities and no grade 4/5 events related to treatment. Nineteen patients (61 %) had a decrease in CA 19-9 after treatment. Twenty-nine patients (94 %) underwent surgical resection as scheduled, with a 77 % R0 resection rate. Median overall survival was 34.8 months (95 % confidence interval, 11.57 to not reached). Patients who had more than a 51 % increase in the autophagy marker LC3-II in circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells had improvement in disease-free survival (15.03 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.05) and overall survival (34.83 vs. 10.83 months, p < 0.05). No outcome differences were demonstrated in the 81 % of patients with abnormal p53 expression assessed by immunohistochemistry in the resected specimens.

conclusionsPreoperative autophagy inhibition with HCQ plus gemcitabine is safe and well tolerated. Surrogate biomarker responses (CA 19-9) and surgical oncologic outcomes were encouraging. p53 status was not associated with adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntirheumatic AgentsAutophagyBiomarkersCA-19-9 AntigenDeoxycytidineDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGemcitabineHumansHydroxychloroquineAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersCA-19-9 AntigenDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID25905586
PMCPMC4663459
OpenAlexW2018872699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.