Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25905541›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2016

Validation of a urine color scale for assessment of urine osmolality in healthy children.

Stavros A Kavouras, Evan C Johnson, Dimitris Bougatsas, Giannis Arnaoutis, Demosthenes B Panagiotakos, Erica Perrier, Alexis Klein

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Metabolite quantification: A fluorescence-based method for urine sample normalization prior toMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stavros A KavourasDepartment of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA. kavouras@uark.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7485-8112
Evan C JohnsonDepartment of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
Dimitris BougatsasDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Giannis ArnaoutisDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Demosthenes B PanagiotakosDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Erica PerrierDanone Research, Palaiseau, France.
Alexis KleinDanone Research, Palaiseau, France.
Harokopio University of Athens · GRDanone (France) · FRUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimUrine color (UC) is a practical tool for hydration assessment. The technique has been validated in adults, but has not been tested in children. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to test the validity of the urine color scale in young, healthy boys and girls, as a marker of urine concentration, investigate its diagnostic ability of detecting hypohydration and examine the ability of children to self-assess UC.

methodsA total of 210 children participated (age: 8-14 years, body mass: 43.4 ± 12.6 kg, height: 1.49 ± 0.13 m, body fat: 25.2 ± 7.8 %). Data collection included: two single urine samples (first morning and before lunch) and 24-h sampling. Hydration status was assessed via urine osmolality (UOsmo) and UC via the eight-point color scale.

resultsMean UC was 3 ± 1 and UOsmo 686 ± 223 mmol kg(-1). UC displayed a positive relationship as a predictor of UOsmo (R (2): 0.45, P < 0.001). Based on the receiver operating curve, UC has good overall classification ability for the three samples (area under the curve 85-92 %), with good sensitivity (92-98 %) and specificity (55-68 %) for detecting hypohydration. The overall accuracy of the self-assessment of UC in the morning or the noon samples ranged from 67 to 78 %. Further threshold analysis indicated that the optimal self-assessed UC threshold for hypohydration was ≥4.

conclusionsThe classical eight-point urine color scale is a valid method to assess hydration in children of age 8-14 years, either by researchers or self-assessment.

Indexed as

UrineAdiposityAdolescentBiomarkersBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildColorDehydrationFemaleHumansMaleOsmolar ConcentrationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersChildrenDehydrationHydration assessmentHydration statusHypohydration markers

Identifiers

PMID25905541
PMCPMC4819932
OpenAlexW2057417054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.