Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25905000›Full record

ReviewEvoDevo2015

The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems.

Gáspár Jékely, Jordi Paps, Claus Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EvoDevo, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
52.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Beyond synapses: cytoplasmic connections in brain function and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  6. The Palaeobiology of Two Crown Group Cnidarians:Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neural versus alternative integrative systems: molecular insights into origins of neurotransmitters.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Developmental processes in Ediacara macrofossils.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gáspár JékelyMax Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Spemannstrasse 35, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Jordi PapsDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford, OX13PS UK.
Claus NielsenThe Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DENatural History Museum · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ctenophores have traditionally been treated as eumetazoans, but some recent whole genome studies have revived the idea that they are, rather, the sister group to all other metazoans. This deep branching position implies either that nervous systems have evolved twice, in Ctenophora and in Eumetazoa, or that an ancestral metazoan nervous system has been lost in sponges and placozoans. We caution, however, that phylogenetic-tree construction artifacts may have placed ctenophores too deep in the metazoan tree. We discuss nervous system origins under these alternative phylogenies and in light of comparative data of ctenophore and eumetazoan nervous systems. We argue that characters like neuropeptide signaling, ciliary photoreceptors, gap junctions and presynaptic molecules are consistent with a shared ancestry of nervous systems. However, if ctenophores are the sister group to all other metazoans, this ancestral nervous system was likely very simple. Further studies are needed to resolve the deep phylogeny of metazoans and to have a better understanding of the early steps of nervous system evolution.

Indexed as

Ciliary photoreceptorCnidarianCtenophoreDEG/ENaC channelsMetazoan phylogenyMicroRNANervous system evolutionNeuropeptideSpongeTrichoplax

Identifiers

PMID25905000
PMCPMC4406211
OpenAlexW2139360357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.