Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25904863›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2015

Chromatin signaling in muscle stem cells: interpreting the regenerative microenvironment.

Arianna Brancaccio, Daniela Palacios

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hemizygous mutation ofAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Nanomedicine, a valuable tool for skeletal muscle disorders: Challenges, promises, and limitations.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of sarcopenia: the S100B perspective.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arianna BrancaccioLaboratory of Epigenetics and Signaling, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy.
Daniela PalaciosLaboratory of Epigenetics and Signaling, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy.
Fondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 12-0168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle regeneration in the adult occurs in response to damage at expenses of a population of adult stem cells, the satellite cells. Upon injury, either physical or genetic, signals released within the satellite cell niche lead to the commitment, expansion and differentiation of the pool of muscle progenitors to repair damaged muscle. To achieve this goal satellite cells undergo a dramatic transcriptional reprogramming to coordinately activate and repress specific subset of genes. Although the epigenetics of muscle regeneration has been extensively discussed, less emphasis has been put on how extra-cellular cues are translated into the specific chromatin reorganization necessary for progression through the myogenic program. In this review we will focus on how satellite cells sense the regenerative microenvironment in physiological and pathological circumstances, paying particular attention to the mechanism through which the external stimuli are transduced to the nucleus to modulate chromatin structure and gene expression. We will discuss the pathways involved and how alterations in this chromatin signaling may contribute to satellite cells dysfunction during aging and disease.

Indexed as

epigeneticsmuscle regenerationsarcopeniasatellite cellssignaling pathwaysskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID25904863
PMCPMC4387924
OpenAlexW2008747552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.