Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25904860›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2015

A circular model for song motor control in Serinus canaria.

Rodrigo G Alonso, Marcos A Trevisan, Ana Amador, Franz Goller, Gabriel B Mindlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Timing of Speech in Brain and Glottis and the Feedback Delay Problem in Motor Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The neurobiology of innate, volitional and learned vocalizations in mammals and birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Nonlinear dynamics in the study of birdsong.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rodrigo G AlonsoPhysics Department, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA Conicet Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcos A TrevisanPhysics Department, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA Conicet Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ana AmadorPhysics Department, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA Conicet Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Franz GollerDepartment of Biology, University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Gabriel B MindlinPhysics Department, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, University of Buenos Aires and IFIBA Conicet Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

Mechanisms for producing complex sounds R01DC006876 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GOLLER, FRANZ · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
Neuromechanics of learned sensorimotor vocal integrationR01DC012859 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MARGOLIASH, DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006876NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Song production in songbirds is controlled by a network of nuclei distributed across several brain regions, which drives respiratory and vocal motor systems to generate sound. We built a model for birdsong production, whose variables are the average activities of different neural populations within these nuclei of the song system. We focus on the predictions of respiratory patterns of song, because these can be easily measured and therefore provide a validation for the model. We test the hypothesis that it is possible to construct a model in which (1) the activity of an expiratory related (ER) neural population fits the observed pressure patterns used by canaries during singing, and (2) a higher forebrain neural population, HVC, is sparsely active, simultaneously with significant motor instances of the pressure patterns. We show that in order to achieve these two requirements, the ER neural population needs to receive two inputs: a direct one, and its copy after being processed by other areas of the song system. The model is capable of reproducing the measured respiratory patterns and makes specific predictions on the timing of HVC activity during their production. These results suggest that vocal production is controlled by a circular network rather than by a simple top-down architecture.

Indexed as

birdsongmotor controlnon-linear dynamicsrate modelssong system

Identifiers

PMID25904860
PMCPMC4387923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.