Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25904782›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Odor-taste convergence in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the awake freely licking rat.

Olga D Escanilla, Jonathan D Victor, Patricia M Di Lorenzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multisensory Integration Underlies the Distinct Representation of Odor-Taste Mixtures in the Gustatory Cortex of Behaving Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Enhancing GABAergic Tone in the Rostral Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Reconfigures Sensorimotor Neural Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cortical Hub for Flavor Sensation in Rodents.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  17. Taste coding strategies in insular cortex.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga D EscanillaDepartment of Psychology, Box 6000, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000 and.
Jonathan D VictorBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10065.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9293-0111
Patricia M Di LorenzoDepartment of Psychology, Box 6000, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000 and diloren@binghamton.edu.

Funding

Temporal Coding in the Gustatory System of the BrainR01DC006914 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI DI LORENZO, PATRICIA M · 2006 to 2020
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flavor is produced by the integration of taste, olfaction, texture, and temperature, currently thought to occur in the cortex. However, previous work has shown that brainstem taste-related nuclei also respond to multisensory inputs. Here, we test the hypothesis that taste and olfaction interact in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS; the first neural relay in the central gustatory pathway) in awake, freely licking rats. Electrophysiological recordings of taste and taste + odor responses were conducted in an experimental chamber following surgical electrode implantation and recovery. Tastants (0.1 m NaCl, 0.1 m sucrose, 0.01 m citric acid, and 0.0001 m quinine) were delivered for five consecutive licks interspersed with five licks of artificial saliva rinse delivered on a VR5 schedule. Odorants were n-amyl acetate (banana), acetic acid (vinegar), octanoic acid (rancid), and phenylethyl alcohol (floral). For each cell, metric space analyses were used to quantify the information conveyed by spike count, by the rate envelope, and by individual spike timing. Results revealed diverse effects of odorants on taste-response magnitude and latency across cells. Importantly, NTS cells were more competent at discriminating taste + odor stimuli versus tastants presented alone for all taste qualities using both rate and temporal coding. The strong interaction of odorants and tastants at the NTS underscores its role as the initial node in the neural circuit that controls food identification and ingestion.

Indexed as

WakefulnessAction PotentialsAnimalsMaleNeuronsOlfactory PerceptionRatsSolitary NucleusTaste Perceptionelectrophysiologyneural codingolfactionrattastetemporal coding

Identifiers

PMID25904782
PMCPMC4405550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.