Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25904724›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2015

Perinatal Risks and Childhood Premorbid Indicators of Later Psychosis: Next Steps for Early Psychosocial Interventions.

Cindy H Liu, Matcheri S Keshavan, Ed Tronick, Larry J Seidman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Placental genomic risk scores and early neurodevelopmental outcomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy H LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Mental Health Center Division of Public Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA; cliu@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Matcheri S KeshavanDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Mental Health Center Division of Public Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA;
Ed TronickDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA; Department of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA;
Larry J SeidmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Mental Health Center Division of Public Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

Brain Function and Structure in Young Children at Familial Risk for SchizophreniaR21MH092840 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GABRIELI, JOHN, KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S. · 2012 to 2013
$482k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH092840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia and affective psychoses are debilitating disorders that together affect 2%-3% of the adult population. Approximately 50%-70% of the offspring of parents with schizophrenia manifest a range of observable difficulties including socioemotional, cognitive, neuromotor, speech-language problems, and psychopathology, and roughly 10% will develop psychosis. Despite the voluminous work on premorbid vulnerabilities to psychosis, especially on schizophrenia, the work on premorbid intervention approaches is scarce. While later interventions during the clinical high-risk (CHR) phase of psychosis, characterized primarily by attenuated positive symptoms, are promising, the CHR period is a relatively late phase of developmental derailment. This article reviews and proposes potential targets for psychosocial interventions during the premorbid period, complementing biological interventions described by others in this Special Theme issue. Beginning with pregnancy, parents with psychoses may benefit from enhanced prenatal care, social support, parenting skills, reduction of symptoms, and programs that are family-centered. For children at risk, we propose preemptive early intervention and cognitive remediation. Empirical research is needed to evaluate these interventions for parents and determine whether interventions for parents and children positively influence the developmental course of the offspring.

Indexed as

Prodromal SymptomsEarly Medical InterventionHumansPrenatal CarePsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsSchizophreniaearly interventionparentingpreventionpsychologicalpsychosisschizophreniastress

Identifiers

PMID25904724
PMCPMC4466191
OpenAlexW2089403933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.