Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25904642›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurointerventional surgery2016

From bench to bedside: utility of the rabbit elastase aneurysm model in preclinical studies of intracranial aneurysm treatment.

Waleed Brinjikji, Yong H Ding, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Measuring artery diameter in rabbit angiograms for neurovascular disease modeling applications and device testing.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatially resolved transcriptomics for evaluation of intracranial vessels in a rabbit model: Proof of concept.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Yong H DingDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ramanathan KadirvelDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Computational and Biological Approach to Flow DiversionR01NS076491 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Juan R Cebral, DAVID F KALLMES · 2011 to 2026
$7.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS076491NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical studies are important in helping practitioners and device developers improve techniques and tools for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Thus an understanding of the major animal models used in such studies is important. The New Zealand rabbit elastase induced arterial aneurysm of the common carotid artery is one of the most commonly used models in testing the safety and efficacy of new endovascular devices. In this review we discuss: (1) the various techniques used to create the aneurysm, (2) complications of aneurysm creation, (3) natural history of the arterial aneurysm, (4) histopathologic and hemodynamic features of the aneurysm, (5) devices tested using this model, and (6) weaknesses of the model. We demonstrate how preclinical studies using this model are applied in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in humans. The model has similar hemodynamic, morphological, and histologic characteristics to human aneurysms, and demonstrates similar healing responses to coiling as human aneurysms. Despite these strengths, however, the model does have many weaknesses, including the fact that the model does not emulate the complex inflammatory processes affecting growing and ruptured aneurysms. Furthermore, the extracranial location of the model affects its ability to be used in preclinical safety assessments of new devices. We conclude that the rabbit elastase model has characteristics that make it a simple and effective model for preclinical studies on the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, but further work is needed to develop aneurysm models that simulate the histopathologic and morphologic characteristics of growing and ruptured aneurysms.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCarotid Artery, CommonEndovascular ProceduresHumansIntracranial AneurysmPancreatic ElastaseRabbitsPancreatic ElastaseAneurysmDeviceInterventionSubarachnoidTechnique

Identifiers

PMID25904642
PMCPMC4932861
OpenAlexW2317071877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.