Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25903923›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

KaBOB: ontology-based semantic integration of biomedical databases.

Kevin M Livingston, Michael Bada, William A Baumgartner, Lawrence E Hunter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A universal diagnosis syntax.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Knowledge-Based Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Structured reviews for data and knowledge-driven research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Enabling semantic queries across federated bioinformatics databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. OWL-NETS: Transforming OWL Representations for Improved Network Inference.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin M LivingstonComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Kevin.Livingston@ucdenver.edu.
Michael BadaComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Mike.Bada@ucdenver.edu.
William A BaumgartnerComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. William.Baumgartner@ucdenver.edu.
Lawrence E HunterComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Larry.Hunter@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
Technology Development for a MolBio Knowledge-BaseR01LM008111 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUNTER, LAWRENCE E · 2004 to 2021
$9.7M
Bio Text NLPR01LM009254 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUNTER, LAWRENCE E · 2006 to 2018
$5.9M
NLM NIH HHS 2T15LM009451NLM NIH HHS LM008111NLM NIH HHS LM009254NLM NIH HHS R01 LM008111NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009254NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to query many independent biological databases using a common ontology-based semantic model would facilitate deeper integration and more effective utilization of these diverse and rapidly growing resources. Despite ongoing work moving toward shared data formats and linked identifiers, significant problems persist in semantic data integration in order to establish shared identity and shared meaning across heterogeneous biomedical data sources.

resultsWe present five processes for semantic data integration that, when applied collectively, solve seven key problems. These processes include making explicit the differences between biomedical concepts and database records, aggregating sets of identifiers denoting the same biomedical concepts across data sources, and using declaratively represented forward-chaining rules to take information that is variably represented in source databases and integrating it into a consistent biomedical representation. We demonstrate these processes and solutions by presenting KaBOB (the Knowledge Base Of Biomedicine), a knowledge base of semantically integrated data from 18 prominent biomedical databases using common representations grounded in Open Biomedical Ontologies. An instance of KaBOB with data about humans and seven major model organisms can be built using on the order of 500 million RDF triples. All source code for building KaBOB is available under an open-source license.

conclusionsKaBOB is an integrated knowledge base of biomedical data representationally based in prominent, actively maintained Open Biomedical Ontologies, thus enabling queries of the underlying data in terms of biomedical concepts (e.g., genes and gene products, interactions and processes) rather than features of source-specific data schemas or file formats. KaBOB resolves many of the issues that routinely plague biomedical researchers intending to work with data from multiple data sources and provides a platform for ongoing data integration and development and for formal reasoning over a wealth of integrated biomedical data.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDatabases, FactualSemanticsBiological OntologiesComputational BiologyData CollectionHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetKnowledge BasesPubMed

Identifiers

PMID25903923
PMCPMC4448321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.