ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
SomInaClust: detection of cancer genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathologic and molecular predictors of survival in BRCA-deficient tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Beyond BRCA deficiency: Clinical and molecular predictors of survival in patients with BRCA-deficient tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.Research square · 2025Article
- BeyondmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- A general calculus of fitness landscapes finds genes under selection in cancers.Genome research · 2022Article
- Network-Based Analysis to Identify Drivers of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Using GoNetic.Cancers · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Profiling of Genomic and Transcriptomic Differences between Risk Groups of Lung Adenocarcinoma and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Analysis of genomic and transcriptomic variations as prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Computational methods for detecting cancer hotspots.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Leveraging protein dynamics to identify cancer mutational hotspots using 3D structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Passenger Hotspot Mutations in Cancer.Cancer cell · 2019Article
- The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2018Review
- Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma.Blood · 2018Article
- Article
- Decoding Somatic Driver Gene Mutations and Affected Signaling Pathways in Human Medulloblastoma Subgroups.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- Overexpressed somatic alleles are enriched in functional elements in Breast Cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Comparison of algorithms for the detection of cancer drivers at subgene resolution.Nature methods · 2017Article
- Characterization of potential driver mutations involved in human breast cancer by computational approaches.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- Multiscale mutation clustering algorithm identifies pan-cancer mutational clusters associated with pathway-level changes in gene expression.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the advances in high throughput technologies, increasing amounts of cancer somatic mutation data are being generated and made available. Only a small number of (driver) mutations occur in driver genes and are responsible for carcinogenesis, while the majority of (passenger) mutations do not influence tumour biology. In this study, SomInaClust is introduced, a method that accurately identifies driver genes based on their mutation pattern across tumour samples and then classifies them into oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes respectively.
resultsSomInaClust starts from the observation that oncogenes mainly contain mutations that, due to positive selection, cluster at similar positions in a gene across patient samples, whereas tumour suppressor genes contain a high number of protein-truncating mutations throughout the entire gene length. The method was shown to prioritize driver genes in 9 different solid cancers. Furthermore it was found to be complementary to existing similar-purpose methods with the additional advantages that it has a higher sensitivity, also for rare mutations (occurring in less than 1% of all samples), and it accurately classifies candidate driver genes in putative oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that the identified genes belong to known cancer signalling pathways, and that the distinction between oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes is biologically relevant.
conclusionsSomInaClust was shown to detect candidate driver genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering and to distinguish oncogenes from tumour suppressor genes. The method could be used for the identification of new cancer genes or to filter mutation data for further data-integration purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.