Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25903787›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

SomInaClust: detection of cancer genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering.

Jimmy Van den Eynden, Ana Carolina Fierro, Lieven P C Verbeke, Kathleen Marchal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BeyondmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational methods for detecting cancer hotspots.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  11. Leveraging protein dynamics to identify cancer mutational hotspots using 3D structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jimmy Van den EyndenDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - iMinds, Ghent, Belgium. jimmy.vandeneynden@intec.ugent.be.
Ana Carolina FierroDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - iMinds, Ghent, Belgium. carolina.fierro@intec.ugent.be.
Lieven P C VerbekeDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - iMinds, Ghent, Belgium. lieven.verbeke@intec.ugent.be.
Kathleen MarchalDepartment of Information Technology, Ghent University - iMinds, Ghent, Belgium. kathleen.marchal@intec.ugent.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the advances in high throughput technologies, increasing amounts of cancer somatic mutation data are being generated and made available. Only a small number of (driver) mutations occur in driver genes and are responsible for carcinogenesis, while the majority of (passenger) mutations do not influence tumour biology. In this study, SomInaClust is introduced, a method that accurately identifies driver genes based on their mutation pattern across tumour samples and then classifies them into oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes respectively.

resultsSomInaClust starts from the observation that oncogenes mainly contain mutations that, due to positive selection, cluster at similar positions in a gene across patient samples, whereas tumour suppressor genes contain a high number of protein-truncating mutations throughout the entire gene length. The method was shown to prioritize driver genes in 9 different solid cancers. Furthermore it was found to be complementary to existing similar-purpose methods with the additional advantages that it has a higher sensitivity, also for rare mutations (occurring in less than 1% of all samples), and it accurately classifies candidate driver genes in putative oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that the identified genes belong to known cancer signalling pathways, and that the distinction between oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes is biologically relevant.

conclusionsSomInaClust was shown to detect candidate driver genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering and to distinguish oncogenes from tumour suppressor genes. The method could be used for the identification of new cancer genes or to filter mutation data for further data-integration purposes.

Indexed as

SoftwareCluster AnalysisGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansMutationNeoplasmsOncogenes

Identifiers

PMID25903787
PMCPMC4410004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.