ArticleBMC health services research2015
Developing patient-centred care: an ethnographic study of patient perceptions and influence on quality improvement.
Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis.Health research policy and systems · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management.Nutrition journal · 2018Pooled it
- Leveraging experience-based co-design to support an innovative health workforce: a graduate certificate in health services innovation case study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Patient-centered medical home and the quality of primary care: survey study with patients and administrators of community healthcare centers in Shanghai, China.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Musculoskeletal patients' preferences for care from physiotherapists or support workers: a discrete choice experiment.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Power to the people? A co-produced critical review of service user involvement in mental health professions education.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024Review
- Reframing Patient Experience Approaches and Methods to Achieve Patient-Centeredness in Healthcare: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Working together to co-produce better health: The experience of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London.Journal of health services research & policy · 2021Article
- Using qualitative evaluation components to help understand context: case study of a family planning intervention with female community health volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Between funder requirements and 'jobbing scientists': the evolution of patient and public involvement in a mental health biomedical research centre - a qualitative study.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Experiences With Health Care Services in Switzerland Among Immigrant Women With Chronic Illnesses.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space.Frontiers in sociology · 2019Review
- Article
- Evaluating organizational change in health care: the patient-centered hospital model.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Public and patient involvement in needs assessment and social innovation: a people-centred approach to care and research for congenital disorders of glycosylation.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Working for patient safety: a qualitative study of women's help-seeking during acute perinatal events.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Article
- A Critical Discussion of Patient Engagement in Research.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding quality improvement from a patient perspective is important for delivering patient-centred care. Yet the ways patients define quality improvement remains unexplored with patients often excluded from improvement work. We examine how patients construct ideas of 'quality improvement' when collaborating with healthcare professionals in improvement work, and how they use these understandings when attempting to improve the quality of their local services.
methodsWe used in-depth interviews with 23 'patient participants' (patients involved in quality improvement work) and observations in several sites in London as part of a four-year ethnographic study of patient and public involvement (PPI) activities run by Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Northwest London. We took an iterative, thematic and discursive analytical approach.
resultsWhen patient participants tried to influence quality improvement or discussed different dimensions of quality improvement their accounts and actions frequently started with talk about improvement as dependent on collective action (e.g. multidisciplinary healthcare professionals and the public), but usually quickly shifted away from that towards a neoliberal discourse emphasising the role of individual patients. Neoliberal ideals about individual responsibility were taken up in their accounts moving them away from the idea of state and healthcare providers being held accountable for upholding patients' rights to quality care, and towards the idea of citizens needing to work on self-improvement. Participants portrayed themselves as governed by self-discipline and personal effort in their PPI work, and in doing so provided examples of how neoliberal appeals for self-regulation and self-determination also permeated their own identity positions.
conclusionsWhen including patient voices in measuring and defining 'quality', governments and public health practitioners should be aware of how neoliberal rationalities at the heart of policy and services may discourage consumers from claiming rights to quality care by contributing to public unwillingness to challenge the status quo in service provision. If the democratic potential of patient and public involvement initiatives is to be realised, it will be crucial to help citizens to engage critically with how neoliberal rationalities can undermine their abilities to demand quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.