Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25903641›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2015

Response to cyclosporine in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: discontinuation is possible.

Ilka Klaassen, Bünyamin Özgören, Carolin E Sadowski, Kristina Möller, Michael van Husen, Anja Lehnhardt, Kirsten Timmermann, Folke Freudenberg, Udo Helmchen, Jun Oh and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Treatment of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in the genomic era.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  10. Panel sequencing distinguishes monogenic forms of nephritis from nephrosis in children.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilka KlaassenPediatric Nephrology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Bünyamin Özgören
Carolin E Sadowski
Kristina Möller
Michael van Husen
Anja Lehnhardt
Kirsten Timmermann
Folke Freudenberg
Udo Helmchen
Jun Oh
Markus J Kemper
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSteroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is still regarded as a serious disease although treatment with cyclosporine (CSA) has improved outcome. However, the duration of treatment in responders is unclear, and treatment of patients with genetic causes is a matter of debate.

methodsThirty-six patients with SRNS were studied retrospectively. Median age at presentation was 3.2 (range, 0.06-15.0) and median follow-up 15.5 years (range, 1.8-27.7), respectively; 23 (64%) had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) on biopsy. In 33/36 patients (92%), genetic testing was performed for at least three most common genes known to be mutated in SRNS.

resultsNineteen patients (53%), especially those with minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) at initial biopsy (p < 0.002), entered complete remission with CSA monotherapy, including one patient with compound heterozygous NPHS1 and dominant ACTN4 mutation, respectively. Ten patients entered partial remission (28%, all FSGS), including two with NPHS2 mutations. Seven patients (six FSGS, one MCNS) did not respond to treatment. In 15 of 19 responders to CSA, treatment was stopped after a median of 3.1 years (range, 0.5-14) and no further relapses occurred in 11/15 (73%) patients with median follow-up of 9.7 years.

conclusionsCSA monotherapy is effective in SRNS. Discontinuation of CSA is possible in many patients with complete remission.

Indexed as

Nephrosis, LipoidActininAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCyclosporineFemaleGermanyGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfantIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKidneyMaleMedication Therapy ManagementActininACTN4 protein, humanCyclosporineGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsnephrinNPHS2 protein

Identifiers

PMID25903641
OpenAlexW2076962715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.