Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25903370›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Comparative genomic analysis reveals occurrence of genetic recombination in virulent Cryptosporidium hominis subtypes and telomeric gene duplications in Cryptosporidium parvum.

Yaqiong Guo, Kevin Tang, Lori A Rowe, Na Li, Dawn M Roellig, Kristine Knipe, Michael Frace, Chunfu Yang, Yaoyu Feng, Lihua Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic crosses within and between species ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. InvestigatingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An update onJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaqiong GuoState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China. guoyaqiong1987@sina.com.
Kevin TangDivision of Scientific Resources, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. kht7@cdc.gov.
Lori A RoweDivision of Scientific Resources, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. ioy0@cdc.gov.
Na LiState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China. nli@ecust.edu.cn.
Dawn M RoelligDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. iyd4@cdc.gov.
Kristine KnipeDivision of Scientific Resources, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. wgg9@cdc.gov.
Michael FraceDivision of Scientific Resources, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. mff3@cdc.gov.
Chunfu YangDivision of Global HIV/AIDS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. cxy0@cdc.gov.
Yaoyu FengState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China. yyfeng@ecust.edu.cn.
Lihua XiaoDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. lxiao@cdc.gov.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USEast China University of Science and Technology · CNWaterborne Environmental (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCryptosporidium hominis is a dominant species for human cryptosporidiosis. Within the species, IbA10G2 is the most virulent subtype responsible for all C. hominis-associated outbreaks in Europe and Australia, and is a dominant outbreak subtype in the United States. In recent yearsIaA28R4 is becoming a major new subtype in the United States. In this study, we sequenced the genomes of two field specimens from each of the two subtypes and conducted a comparative genomic analysis of the obtained sequences with those from the only fully sequenced Cryptosporidium parvum genome.

resultsAltogether, 8.59-9.05 Mb of Cryptosporidium sequences in 45-767 assembled contigs were obtained from the four specimens, representing 94.36-99.47% coverage of the expected genome. These genomes had complete synteny in gene organization and 96.86-97.0% and 99.72-99.83% nucleotide sequence similarities to the published genomes of C. parvum and C. hominis, respectively. Several major insertions and deletions were seen between C. hominis and C. parvum genomes, involving mostly members of multicopy gene families near telomeres. The four C. hominis genomes were highly similar to each other and divergent from the reference IaA25R3 genome in some highly polymorphic regions. Major sequence differences among the four specimens sequenced in this study were in the 5' and 3' ends of chromosome 6 and the gp60 region, largely the result of genetic recombination.

conclusionsThe sequence similarity among specimens of the two dominant outbreak subtypes and genetic recombination in chromosome 6, especially around the putative virulence determinant gp60 region, suggest that genetic recombination plays a potential role in the emergence of hyper-transmissible C. hominis subtypes. The high sequence conservation between C. parvum and C. hominis genomes and significant differences in copy numbers of MEDLE family secreted proteins and insulinase-like proteases indicate that telomeric gene duplications could potentially contribute to host expansion in C. parvum.

Indexed as

GenomeComparative Genomic HybridizationContig MappingCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumCryptosporidium parvumDNA, ProtozoanFaceGene DuplicationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansOocystsRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNATelomereVirulenceDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID25903370
PMCPMC4407392
OpenAlexW2008149879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.