Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25903353›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2015

Associations of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody with disease progression and treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Wanruchada Katchamart, Ajchara Koolvisoot, Emvalee Aromdee, Praveena Chiowchanwesawakit, Chayawee Muengchan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wanruchada KatchamartDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 8th Floor Asadang Building, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. wanruchada.kat@mahidol.ac.th.
Ajchara KoolvisootDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 8th Floor Asadang Building, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Emvalee AromdeeDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 8th Floor Asadang Building, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Praveena ChiowchanwesawakitDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 8th Floor Asadang Building, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Chayawee MuengchanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 8th Floor Asadang Building, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Siriraj Hospital · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the association of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) status with disease progression and treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of 276 adult patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology 1987 classification criteria for RA were recruited from the Rheumatology clinic, Siriraj Hospital, from January 2011 to December 2012. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected at baseline and every 3 months up to 1 year of follow-up. RF and ACPA were measured at baseline. Radiography of the hands and feet was performed at baseline and 1 year. Patients with RF+/ACPA+ had significantly more severe disease activity and impaired functional status than those who had RF-/ACPA-. Although they received more aggressive treatment with methotrexate and combination of non-biologic, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug than other groups, fewer patients in this group achieved remission at 1 year of follow-up, especially when compared to RF-/ACPA- group (12 vs. 18 %). For radiographic erosion, patients with the presence of either RF or ACPA had a higher proportion of hand erosion than seronegative patients at baseline (77, 73, 83, and 32 %, p < 0.001 for RF+/ACPA+, RF+/ACPA-, RF-/ACPA+, and RF-/ACPA-, respectively). After 1 year of follow-up, patients who developed new erosion at the hands were more prevalent in RF+/ACPA+ (32 %) and RF+/ACPA- (33 %) groups. However, "newly developed" feet erosion was most common in RF+/ACPA- group (40 %) than in other groups. Patients with positive either RF or ACPA or both have more severe and aggressive disease that requires intensive treatment to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedPeptides, CyclicRheumatoid FactorSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsAutoantibodiescyclic citrullinated peptideMethotrexatePeptides, CyclicRheumatoid FactorAnti-citrullinated peptide antibodiesDAS28HAQRheumatoid arthritisRheumatoid factor

Identifiers

PMID25903353
OpenAlexW1978435955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.