Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25903304›Full record

ArticleCancer2015

Physician's peer exposure and the adoption of a new cancer treatment modality.

Craig Evan Pollack, Pamela R Soulos, Cary P Gross

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Applications of network analysis to routinely collected health care data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The influence of strong and weak ties in physician peer networks on new drug adoption.International journal of health economics and management · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Craig Evan PollackDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pamela R SoulosCancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cary P GrossCancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Johns Hopkins University · USYale Cancer Center · USYale University · US

Funding

Use and Outcomes of Radiation Therapy for Medicare Patients with Common CancersR01CA149045 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, CARY P. · 2010 to 2012
$1.5M
A Network Analytic Approach to Modeling Variation in Prostate Cancer CareK07CA151910 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POLLACK, CRAIG EVAN · 2011 to 2015
$780k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA151910NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035136NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035139NCI NIH HHS N02 PC015105NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149045NCI NIH HHS R01CA149045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew technologies, often with limited evidence to support their effectiveness, frequently diffuse into clinical practice and increase the costs of cancer care. The authors studied whether physician peer exposure was associated with the subsequent adoption of a new approach to adjuvant radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for the treatment of women with early-stage breast cancer.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. Data from 2003 through 2004 were used to classify surgeons as early brachytherapy adopters and, among non-early adopters, whether they shared patients with early adopters (peer exposure). Data from 2005 through 2006 were used to examine whether women were more likely to receive brachytherapy if their surgeons were exposed to early adopters.

resultsOverall, the percentage of women receiving brachytherapy increased from 3.2% in 2003 through 2004 to 4.7% in 2005 through 2006. In this latter period, a total of 2087 patients were assigned to 328 non-early adopting surgeons. In unadjusted analyses, patients whose surgeons were connected to early adopters during 2003 through 2004 were found to be significantly more likely to receive brachytherapy in 2005 through 2006 compared with those whose surgeons were not connected to early adopters (8.0% vs 4.1%; P = .003). In adjusted analyses, the predicted probability of receiving brachytherapy among patients whose surgeon did have an early-adopting peer was 3.9% versus 1.0% among those whose surgeons did not have an early-adopting peer (P = .03).

conclusionsExposure to peers who were early adopters of brachytherapy was found to be associated with a surgeon's subsequent uptake of brachytherapy. The results of the current study provide an example of a novel approach to examining the diffusion of innovation in cancer care.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMastectomy, SegmentalPhysiciansRetrospective Studiesbrachytherapybreast cancerdiffusion of innovationphysician patient-sharing networks

Identifiers

PMID25903304
PMCPMC4529814
OpenAlexW1551298296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.