Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25902825›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2015

Efficacy of Bilevel-auto Treatment in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Not Responsive to or Intolerant of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation.

Annalisa Carlucci, Piero Ceriana, Marco Mancini, Serena Cirio, Paola Pierucci, Nadia D'Artavilla Lupo, Felice Gadaleta, Elisa Morrone, Francesco Fanfulla

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annalisa CarlucciPulmonary Rehabilitation, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Piero CerianaPulmonary Rehabilitation, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Marco ManciniPulmonary Rehabilitation, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Serena CirioPulmonary Rehabilitation, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paola PierucciDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst NSW, Australia.
Nadia D'Artavilla LupoSleep Medicine Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Felice GadaletaSleep Medicine Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Elisa MorroneSleep Medicine Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Francesco FanfullaSleep Medicine Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri · ITSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilation with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, it was recently suggested that a novel mode of ventilation, Bilevel-auto, could be equally effective in treating patients unable to tolerate CPAP. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of Bilevel-auto to treat OSA patients whose nocturnal ventilatory disturbances are not completely corrected by CPAP.

methodsWe enrolled 66 consecutive OSA patients, not responsive to (group A) or intolerant of (group B) CPAP treatment, after a full night of manual CPAP titration in a laboratory. Full polysomnography data and daytime sleepiness score were compared for each group in the three different conditions: basal, during CPAP, and during Bilevel-auto.

resultsThe apnea-hypopnea index decreased significantly during CPAP in both groups; however, in the group A, there was a further significant improvement during Bilevel-auto. The same trend was observed for oxygenation indices, while the distribution and the efficiency of sleep did not differ following the switch from CPAP to Bilevel-auto.

conclusionsThis study confirmed the role of Bilevel-auto as an effective therapeutic alternative to CPAP in patients intolerant of this latter mode of ventilation. Moreover, extending the use of Bilevel-auto to those OSA patients not responsive to CPAP, we showed a significantly better correction of nocturnal respiratory disturbances.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyRespiration, ArtificialSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSleep StagesTreatment OutcomeBilevel-autoCOPDCPAPnoninvasive ventilationobesitysleepsleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID25902825
PMCPMC4543258
OpenAlexW2286460089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.