Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25902794›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2015

Analysis of conglutin seed storage proteins across lupin species using transcriptomic, protein and comparative genomic approaches.

Rhonda C Foley, Jose C Jimenez-Lopez, Lars G Kamphuis, James K Hane, Su Melser, Karam B Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In Silico Hydrolysis of Lupin (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulatory Effects of ABA and GA on the Expression of Conglutin Genes andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Narrow Leafed Lupin (Nutrients · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effect ofPharmaceutical biology · 2021
    Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rhonda C FoleyCSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Floreat, WA, Australia. Rhonda.Foley@csiro.au.
Jose C Jimenez-LopezThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. Jose.Jimenez-Lopez@uwa.edu.au.
Lars G KamphuisCSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Floreat, WA, Australia. Lars.Kamphuis@csiro.au.
James K HaneCSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Floreat, WA, Australia. James.Hane@curtin.edu.au.
Su MelserCSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Floreat, WA, Australia. su.melser@csiro.au.
Karam B SinghCSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Floreat, WA, Australia. Karam.Singh@csiro.au.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe major proteins in lupin seeds are conglutins that have primary roles in supplying carbon, sulphur and nitrogen and energy for the germinating seedling. They fall into four families; α, β, γ and δ. Interest in these conglutins is growing as family members have been shown to have beneficial nutritional and pharmaceutical properties.

resultsAn in-depth transcriptome and draft genome from the narrow-leafed lupin (NLL; Lupinus angustifolius) variety, Tanjil, were examined and 16 conglutin genes were identified. Using RNAseq data sets, the structure and expression of these 16 conglutin genes were analysed across eight lupin varieties from five lupin species. Phylogenic analysis suggest that the α and γ conglutins diverged prior to lupin speciation while β and δ members diverged both prior and after speciation. A comparison of the expression of the 16 conglutin genes was performed, and in general the conglutin genes showed similar levels of RNA expression among varieties within species, but quite distinct expression patterns between lupin species. Antibodies were generated against the specific conglutin families and immunoblot analyses were used to compare the levels of conglutin proteins in various tissues and during different stages of seed development in NLL, Tanjil, confirming the expression in the seed. This analysis showed that the conglutins were expressed highly at the mature seed stage, in all lupin species, and a range of polypeptide sizes were observed for each conglutin family.

conclusionsThis study has provided substantial information on the complexity of the four conglutin families in a range of lupin species in terms of their gene structure, phylogenetic relationships as well as their relative RNA and protein abundance during seed development. The results demonstrate that the majority of the heterogeneity of conglutin polypeptides is likely to arise from post-translational modification from a limited number of precursor polypeptides rather than a large number of different genes. Overall, the results demonstrate a high degree of plasticity for conglutin expression during seed development in different lupin species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantTranscriptomeLupinusMolecular Sequence DataSeed Storage ProteinsSequence Analysis, RNASpecies SpecificityWestern AustraliaSeed Storage Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25902794
PMCPMC4407355
OpenAlexW2066147974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.