Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25902514›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Endosymbiosis undone by stepwise elimination of the plastid in a parasitic dinoflagellate.

Sebastian G Gornik, Febrimarsa, Andrew M Cassin, James I MacRae, Abhinay Ramaprasad, Zineb Rchiad, Malcolm J McConville, Antony Bacic, Geoffrey I McFadden, Arnab Pain and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Infection of Norway lobster (Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Sebastian G GornikSchool of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland;
FebrimarsaSchool of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia;
Andrew M CassinAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia;
James I MacRaeThe Francis Crick Institute, London, NW7 1AA, United Kingdom; Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia;
Abhinay RamaprasadBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia;
Zineb RchiadBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia;
Malcolm J McConvilleBio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia;
Antony BacicSchool of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia;
Geoffrey I McFaddenSchool of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia;
Arnab PainBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia; Global Station for Zoonosis Control, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, N20 W10 Kita-ku, Sapporo, 001-0020 Japan; and.
Ross F WallerSchool of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, United Kingdom rfw26@cam.ac.uk.
University of Melbourne · AUKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SAAustralian Research Council · AUOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organelle gain through endosymbiosis has been integral to the origin and diversification of eukaryotes, and, once gained, plastids and mitochondria seem seldom lost. Indeed, discovery of nonphotosynthetic plastids in many eukaryotes--notably, the apicoplast in apicomplexan parasites such as the malaria pathogen Plasmodium--highlights the essential metabolic functions performed by plastids beyond photosynthesis. Once a cell becomes reliant on these ancillary functions, organelle dependence is apparently difficult to overcome. Previous examples of endosymbiotic organelle loss (either mitochondria or plastids), which have been invoked to explain the origin of eukaryotic diversity, have subsequently been recognized as organelle reduction to cryptic forms, such as mitosomes and apicoplasts. Integration of these ancient symbionts with their hosts has been too well developed to reverse. Here, we provide evidence that the dinoflagellate Hematodinium sp., a marine parasite of crustaceans, represents a rare case of endosymbiotic organelle loss by the elimination of the plastid. Extensive RNA and genomic sequencing data provide no evidence for a plastid organelle, but, rather, reveal a metabolic decoupling from known plastid functions that typically impede organelle loss. This independence has been achieved through retention of ancestral anabolic pathways, enzyme relocation from the plastid to the cytosol, and metabolic scavenging from the parasite's host. Hematodinium sp. thus represents a further dimension of endosymbiosis--life after the organelle.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAmino Acid OxidoreductasesAnimalsCell NucleusCrustaceaCytosolDinoflagellidaFatty AcidsFatty Acid SynthasesMitochondriaMolecular Sequence DataParasitesPhotosynthesisPhylogenyPlasmodiumPlastidsAdenosine TriphosphateAmino Acid Oxidoreductasesdiaminopimelate dehydrogenaseFatty AcidsFatty Acid SynthasesRNAdiaminopimelate aminotransferaseendosymbiosisorganelle lossplastid lossplastid metabolism

Identifiers

PMID25902514
PMCPMC4426444
OpenAlexW2092362402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.