Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25902513›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Hybrid apomicts trapped in the ecological niches of their sexual ancestors.

Martin Mau, John T Lovell, José M Corral, Christiane Kiefer, Marcus A Koch, Olawale M Aliyu, Timothy F Sharbel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Genetic mapping of theFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Rise of Apomixis in Natural Plant Populations.Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  17. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin MauApomixis Research Group, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, 06466 Gatersleben, Germany; mau@ipk-gatersleben.de.
John T LovellDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712;
José M CorralDepartment of Bioanalytics, Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 96450 Coburg, Germany;
Christiane KieferDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Marcus A KochDepartment of Biodiversity and Plant Systematics, Centre for Organismal Studies Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and.
Olawale M AliyuApomixis Research Group, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, 06466 Gatersleben, Germany; Department of Crop Production, College of Agriculture, Kwara State University, PMB 1530 Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.
Timothy F SharbelApomixis Research Group, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, 06466 Gatersleben, Germany;
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research · DECoburg University of Applied Sciences · DEHeidelberg University · DEKwara State University · NGMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DEThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asexual reproduction is expected to reduce the adaptive potential to novel or changing environmental conditions, restricting or altering the ecological niche of asexual lineages. Asexual lineages of plants and animals are typically polyploid, an attribute that may influence their genetic variation, plasticity, adaptive potential, and niche breadth. The genus Boechera (Brassicaceae) represents an ideal model to test the relative ecological and biogeographic impacts of reproductive mode and ploidy because it is composed of diploid sexual and both diploid and polyploid asexual (i.e., apomictic) lineages. Here, we demonstrate a strong association between a transcriptionally conserved allele and apomictic seed formation. We then use this allele as a proxy apomixis marker in 1,649 accessions to demonstrate that apomixis is likely to be a common feature across the Boechera phylogeny. Phylogeographic analyses of these data demonstrate (i) species-specific niche differentiation in sexuals, (ii) extensive niche conservation between differing reproductive modes of the same species, (iii) ploidy-specific niche differentiation within and among species, and (iv) occasional niche drift between apomicts and their sexual ancestors. We conclude that ploidy is a substantially stronger and more common driver of niche divergence within and across Boechera species although variation in both traits may not necessarily lead to niche evolution on the species scale.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell LineageEcosystemPloidiesAllelesBrassicaceaeGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationGeographyHaplotypesNorth AmericaParthenogenesisPhylogenyPhylogeographySeedsGenetic MarkersAPOLLOBoecherageographic parthenogenesisniche conservationUPGRADE2

Identifiers

PMID25902513
PMCPMC4426457
OpenAlexW2063434414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.