Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25902496›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Major reorientation of tRNA substrates defines specificity of dihydrouridine synthases.

Robert T Byrne, Huw T Jenkins, Daniel T Peters, Fiona Whelan, James Stowell, Naveed Aziz, Pavel Kasatsky, Marina V Rodnina, Eugene V Koonin, Andrey L Konevega and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In Silico Analysis of Potential Stabilizer Binding Sites at Protein-RNA Interfaces.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. RNA modifying enzymes shape tRNA biogenesis and function.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structural and functional characterization of TrmM in mProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Robert T ByrneYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, and.
Huw T JenkinsYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, and.
Daniel T PetersYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, and.
Fiona WhelanYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, and.
James StowellYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, and Department of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom;
Naveed AzizDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; Genome Canada, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1, Canada;
Pavel KasatskyMolecular and Radiation Biophysics Department, B.P. Konstantinov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute," 188300 Gatchina, Russia; St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia;
Marina V RodninaDepartment of Physical Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; and.
Eugene V KooninNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894.
Andrey L KonevegaMolecular and Radiation Biophysics Department, B.P. Konstantinov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute," 188300 Gatchina, Russia; St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia; Department of Physical Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; and.
Alfred A AntsonYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, and fred.antson@york.ac.uk.
New York Structural Biology Center · USPetersburg Nuclear Physics Institute · RUGenome Canada · CAMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DENational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Finding Protein Sequence Motifs--Methods And ApplicationsZIALM000061 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$10.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 098230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reduction of specific uridines to dihydrouridine is one of the most common modifications in tRNA. Increased levels of the dihydrouridine modification are associated with cancer. Dihydrouridine synthases (Dus) from different subfamilies selectively reduce distinct uridines, located at spatially unique positions of folded tRNA, into dihydrouridine. Because the catalytic center of all Dus enzymes is conserved, it is unclear how the same protein fold can be reprogrammed to ensure that nucleotides exposed at spatially distinct faces of tRNA can be accommodated in the same active site. We show that the Escherichia coli DusC is specific toward U16 of tRNA. Unexpectedly, crystal structures of DusC complexes with tRNA(Phe) and tRNA(Trp) show that Dus subfamilies that selectively modify U16 or U20 in tRNA adopt identical folds but bind their respective tRNA substrates in an almost reverse orientation that differs by a 160° rotation. The tRNA docking orientation appears to be guided by subfamily-specific clusters of amino acids ("binding signatures") together with differences in the shape of the positively charged tRNA-binding surfaces. tRNA orientations are further constrained by positional differences between the C-terminal "recognition" domains. The exquisite substrate specificity of Dus enzymes is therefore controlled by a relatively simple mechanism involving major reorientation of the whole tRNA molecule. Such reprogramming of the enzymatic specificity appears to be a unique evolutionary solution for altering tRNA recognition by the same protein fold.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsEvolution, MolecularOxidoreductasesProtein BindingProtein FoldingRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, TransferSubstrate SpecificityUridineX-Ray DiffractionAmino AcidsEscherichia coli ProteinsOxidoreductasesRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, TransferUridinedihydrouridine synthaseprotein–RNA interactionsubstrate specificitytRNA modificationX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID25902496
PMCPMC4434734
OpenAlexW2113120772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.