Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25902355›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative proteomic analysis of the molecular responses of mouse macrophages to titanium dioxide and copper oxide nanoparticles unravels some toxic mechanisms for copper oxide nanoparticles in macrophages.

Sarah Triboulet, Catherine Aude-Garcia, Lucie Armand, Véronique Collin-Faure, Mireille Chevallet, Hélène Diemer, Adèle Gerdil, Fabienne Proamer, Jean-Marc Strub, Aurélie Habert and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiparametric Profiling of Engineered Nanomaterials: Unmasking the Surface Coating Effect.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (γ-FeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah TribouletLaboratory of Chemistry and Biology of Metals, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Catherine Aude-GarciaLaboratory of Chemistry and Biology of Metals, CEA/ iRTSV, Grenoble, France; Laboratory of Chemistry and Biology of Metals, CNRS UMR5249, Grenoble, France.
Lucie ArmandService de Chimie Inorganique et Biologique, Univ. Grenoble Alpes & CEA, Grenoble, France.
Véronique Collin-FaureLaboratory of Chemistry and Biology of Metals, CEA/ iRTSV, Grenoble, France.
Mireille ChevalletLaboratory of Chemistry and Biology of Metals, CEA/ iRTSV, Grenoble, France.
Hélène DiemerLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse BioOrganique (LSMBO), Université de Strasbourg & CNRS UMR 7178, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Strasbourg, France.
Adèle GerdilLaboratoire Francis Perrin (Unité de recherche Associée 2453), Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, CEA-Saclay 91191 Gif/Yvette, France.
Fabienne ProamerEtablissement Français du Sang-Alsace, Unité MIxte de recherche S949 Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Marc StrubLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse BioOrganique (LSMBO), Université de Strasbourg & CNRS UMR 7178, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Strasbourg, France.
Aurélie HabertLaboratoire Francis Perrin (Unité de recherche Associée 2453), Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, CEA-Saclay 91191 Gif/Yvette, France.
Nathalie HerlinLaboratoire Francis Perrin (Unité de recherche Associée 2453), Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, CEA-Saclay 91191 Gif/Yvette, France.
Alain Van DorsselaerLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse BioOrganique (LSMBO), Université de Strasbourg & CNRS UMR 7178, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Strasbourg, France.
Marie CarrièreService de Chimie Inorganique et Biologique, Univ. Grenoble Alpes & CEA, Grenoble, France.
Thierry RabilloudLaboratory of Chemistry and Biology of Metals, CNRS UMR5249, Grenoble, France.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire de Chimie et Biologie des Métaux · FRCEA Grenoble · FRCEA Paris-Saclay · FRTechnologie Médicale (France) · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Titanium dioxide and copper oxide nanoparticles are more and more widely used because of their catalytic properties, of their light absorbing properties (titanium dioxide) or of their biocidal properties (copper oxide), increasing the risk of adverse health effects. In this frame, the responses of mouse macrophages were studied. Both proteomic and targeted analyses were performed to investigate several parameters, such as phagocytic capacity, cytokine release, copper release, and response at sub toxic doses. Besides titanium dioxide and copper oxide nanoparticles, copper ions were used as controls. We also showed that the overall copper release in the cell does not explain per se the toxicity observed with copper oxide nanoparticles. In addition, both copper ion and copper oxide nanoparticles, but not titanium oxide, induced DNA strands breaks in macrophages. As to functional responses, the phagocytic capacity was not hampered by any of the treatments at non-toxic doses, while copper ion decreased the lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine and nitric oxide productions. The proteomic analyses highlighted very few changes induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles, but an induction of heme oxygenase, an increase of glutathione synthesis and a decrease of tetrahydrobiopterin in response to copper oxide nanoparticles. Subsequent targeted analyses demonstrated that the increase in glutathione biosynthesis and the induction of heme oxygenase (e.g. by lovastatin/monacolin K) are critical for macrophages to survive a copper challenge, and that the intermediates of the catecholamine pathway induce a strong cross toxicity with copper oxide nanoparticles and copper ions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SurvivalCopperCytokinesDihydroxyphenylalanineDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEnzyme InductionGlutathioneHeme Oxygenase (Decyclizing)MacrophagesMetal NanoparticlesMiceNitric OxidePhagocytosisProteomicsCoppercuprous oxideCytokinesDihydroxyphenylalanineGlutathioneHeme Oxygenase (Decyclizing)Nitric OxideTitaniumtitanium dioxide

Identifiers

PMID25902355
PMCPMC4406518
OpenAlexW2011987793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.