Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25901966›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Evaluation of a novel biomarker of added sugar intake (δ 13C) compared with self-reported added sugar intake and the Healthy Eating Index-2010 in a community-based, rural U.S. sample.

Valisa E Hedrick, Brenda M Davy, Grace A Wilburn, A Hope Jahren, Jamie M Zoellner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Influence of dietary macronutrients on liver fat accumulation and metabolism.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2017
    Review
  19. New markers of dietary added sugar intake.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valisa E Hedrick1Department of Human Nutrition,Foods and Exercise,Virginia Tech,295 West Campus Drive,335A Wallace Hall (0430),Blacksburg,VA 24061,USA.
Brenda M Davy1Department of Human Nutrition,Foods and Exercise,Virginia Tech,295 West Campus Drive,335A Wallace Hall (0430),Blacksburg,VA 24061,USA.
Grace A Wilburn1Department of Human Nutrition,Foods and Exercise,Virginia Tech,295 West Campus Drive,335A Wallace Hall (0430),Blacksburg,VA 24061,USA.
A Hope Jahren2Department of Geology and Geophysics,University of Hawaii at Manoa,Honolulu,HI,USA.
Jamie M Zoellner1Department of Human Nutrition,Foods and Exercise,Virginia Tech,295 West Campus Drive,335A Wallace Hall (0430),Blacksburg,VA 24061,USA.

Funding

SIPsmartER: A nutrition literacy approach to reducing sugar-sweetened beveragesR01CA154364 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ZOELLNER, JAMIE · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA154364-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe δ 13C value of human blood is an emerging novel biomarker of added sugar (AS) intake for adults. However, no free-living, community-based assessments of comparative validity of this biomarker have been conducted. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine if Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) score, SoFAAS score (HEI-2010 sub-component for solid fat, alcohol and AS), AS and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intakes were associated with δ 13C value of fingerstick blood in a community-based sample of adults, while controlling for relevant demographics.

designA cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from assessments of BMI, dietary intake using 24 h recalls and a fingerstick blood sample was completed. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, multiple linear regression and one-way ANOVA.

settingRural Southwest Virginia, U.S.A. SUBJECTS: Adults (n 216) aged >18 years who consumed at least 837 kJ/d (200 kcal/d) from SSB.

resultsThis sample of adult participants with low socio-economic status demonstrated a mean HEI-2010 score of 43.4 (sd 12.2), mean SoFAAS score of 10.2 (sd 5.7), mean AS intake of 93 (sd 65) g/d and mean blood δ 13C value of -18.88 (sd 0.7) ‰. In four separate regression models, HEI-2010 (R 2=0.16), SoFAAS (R 2=0.19), AS (R 2=0.15) and SSB (R 2=0.14) predicted δ 13C value (all P≤0.001). Age was also predictive of δ 13C value, but not sex or race.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that fingerstick δ 13C value has the potential to be a minimally invasive method for assessing AS and SSB intake and overall dietary quality in community-based settings. Strengths, limitations and future areas of research for using an objective δ 13C biomarker in diet-related public health studies are discussed.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBeveragesBiomarkersBody Mass IndexCarbon IsotopesCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SucroseEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleBiomarkersCarbon IsotopesDietary SucroseAdded sugarBiomarkerDietary assessmentDietary quality

Identifiers

PMID25901966
PMCPMC5576148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.