Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25901755›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization.

Jeerapond Leelawattanachai, Keon-Woo Kwon, Praveesuda Michael, Richard Ting, Ju-Young Kim, Moonsoo M Jin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Introduction to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. HER3 PET Imaging:Cancers · 2021
    Article
  9. Clinical Pharmacology of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Impact of FcγRI Binding on Immuno-PET.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. CAR T Therapy Targeting ICAM-1 Eliminates Advanced Human Thyroid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeerapond LeelawattanachaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States of America; National Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.
Keon-Woo KwonDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States of America.
Praveesuda MichaelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States of America.
Richard TingDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States of America.
Ju-Young KimDepartment of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok, South Korea.
Moonsoo M JinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States of America; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 100-715, South Korea.
Cornell University · USDongguk University · KRKangwon National University · KR

Funding

Theranostic nanoparticles for the treatment of RAI refractory thyroid cancerR01CA178007 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JIN, MOONSOO M., WANG, YI · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178007NCI NIH HHS R01CA178007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to use a systemically injected agent to image tumor is influenced by tumor characteristics such as permeability and vascularity, and the size, shape, and affinity of the imaging agent. In this study, six different imaging biomolecules, with or without specificity to tumor, were examined for tumor uptake and internalization at the whole body, ex-vivo tissue, and cellular levels: antibodies, antibody fragments (Fab), serum albumin, and streptavidin. The time of peak tumor uptake was dependent solely on the size of molecules, suggesting that molecular size is the major factor that influences tumor uptake by its effect on systemic clearance and diffusion into tumor. Affinity to tumor antigen failed to augment tumor uptake of Fab above non-specific accumulation, which suggests that Fab fragments of typical monoclonal antibodies may fall below an affinity threshold for use as molecular imaging agents. Despite abundant localization into the tumor, albumin and streptavidin were not found on cell surface or inside cells. By comparing biomolecules differing in size and affinity, our study highlights that while pharmacokinetics are a dominant factor in tumor uptake for biomolecules, affinity to tumor antigen is required for tumor binding and internalization.

Indexed as

EndocytosisAnimalsDiagnostic ImagingHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansImmunoglobulin GIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Mice, SCIDModels, BiologicalMolecular WeightNeoplasmsProtein BindingProteinsTissue DistributionWhole Body ImagingImmunoglobulin GIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25901755
PMCPMC4406587
OpenAlexW2317249847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.